Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37274196›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2023

Multiple sclerosis lesion segmentation: revisiting weighting mechanisms for federated learning.

Dongnan Liu, Mariano Cabezas, Dongang Wang, Zihao Tang, Lei Bai, Geng Zhan, Yuling Luo, Kain Kyle, Linda Ly, James Yu and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Survey of Medical Applications of Federated Learning.Healthcare informatics research · 2024
    Article
  8. Medical Imaging Applications of Federated Learning.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Dongnan LiuSchool of Computer Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Mariano CabezasBrain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Dongang WangBrain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Zihao TangSchool of Computer Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Lei BaiBrain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Geng ZhanBrain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Yuling LuoBrain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Kain KyleBrain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Linda LyBrain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
James YuBrain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Chun-Chien ShiehBrain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Aria NguyenBrain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Ettikan Kandasamy KaruppiahNVIDIA Corporation, Singapore, Singapore.
Ryan SullivanSchool of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Fernando CalamanteBrain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Michael BarnettBrain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Wanli OuyangSchool of Electrical and Information Engineering, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Weidong CaiSchool of Computer Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Chenyu WangBrain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and introduction: Federated learning (FL) has been widely employed for medical image analysis to facilitate multi-client collaborative learning without sharing raw data. Despite great success, FL's applications remain suboptimal in neuroimage analysis tasks such as lesion segmentation in multiple sclerosis (MS), due to variance in lesion characteristics imparted by different scanners and acquisition parameters. Methods: In this work, we propose the first FL MS lesion segmentation framework via two effective re-weighting mechanisms. Specifically, a learnable weight is assigned to each local node during the aggregation process, based on its segmentation performance. In addition, the segmentation loss function in each client is also re-weighted according to the lesion volume for the data during training. Results: The proposed method has been validated on two FL MS segmentation scenarios using public and clinical datasets. Specifically, the case-wise and voxel-wise Dice score of the proposed method under the first public dataset is 65.20 and 74.30, respectively. On the second in-house dataset, the case-wise and voxel-wise Dice score is 53.66, and 62.31, respectively. Discussions and conclusions: The Comparison experiments on two FL MS segmentation scenarios using public and clinical datasets have demonstrated the effectiveness of the proposed method by significantly outperforming other FL methods. Furthermore, the segmentation performance of FL incorporating our proposed aggregation mechanism can achieve comparable performance to that from centralized training with all the raw data.

Indexed as

deep learningfederated learningMRImultiple sclerosissegmentation

Identifiers

PMID37274196
PMCPMC10232857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.