Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37274176›Full record

ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2023

Renal transplant and hemostasis: early postoperative changes in recipients and donors.

Ruchika Kohli, Sean Platton, Suzanne Forbes, Raj Thuraisingham, Joachim Tan, Laura Green, Peter MacCallum

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 80% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ruchika KohliWolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Sean PlattonBarts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Suzanne ForbesBarts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Raj ThuraisinghamBarts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Joachim TanSt. Georges, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Laura GreenBarts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Peter MacCallumWolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Barts Health NHS Trust · GBQueen Mary University of London · GBNHS Blood and Transplant · GBSt George's, University of London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The benefit of administering pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis following renal transplantation remains uncertain. Objectives: To compare hemostatic parameters before and after renal transplant surgery in both recipients and their donors at predetermined time points. Methods: Blood samples were collected at baseline (T1), immediately after surgery (T2), and at 24 hours after surgery (T3) in both recipients and donors and at 72 (T4) and 120 hours (T5) from recipients only. Assays included Results: Fifty-two patients (28 recipients and 24 donors) were enrolled. Both donors and recipients had increased FVIIIc, VWF, F1 + 2, D-dimer, and PAI immediately after surgery but reduced antithrombin. Mixed-model analysis showed that the magnitude of change over time (between T1 and T3) for FVIIIc (mean estimated difference [MED], 72; 95% CI, 41-102; Conclusion: Persistence of a hypercoagulable state was more prominent in recipients after 24 hours despite recovery in renal function and initiation of thromboprophylaxis.

Indexed as

hemostasisrecipientsrenal transplantthrombin generationthromboprophylaxis

Identifiers

PMID37274176
PMCPMC10238749
OpenAlexW4367056997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.