Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37273935›Full record

ArticleInternet interventions2023

Using Personas in the development of eHealth interventions for chronic pain: A scoping review and narrative synthesis.

Sara Laureen Bartels, Afra S Taygar, Sophie I Johnsson, Suzanne Petersson, Ida Flink, Katja Boersma, Lance M McCracken, Rikard K Wicksell

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Internet interventions, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Sara Laureen BartelsDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Afra S TaygarDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Sophie I JohnssonDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Suzanne PeterssonDepartment of Medicine and Optometry, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Region Kalmar County, Sweden.
Ida FlinkCenter for Health and Medical Psychology (CHAMP), School of Law, Psychology, and Social Work, Örebro University, Sweden.
Katja BoersmaCenter for Health and Medical Psychology (CHAMP), School of Law, Psychology, and Social Work, Örebro University, Sweden.
Lance M McCrackenDivision of Clinical Psychology, Department of Psychology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Rikard K WicksellDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karolinska Institutet · SEÖrebro University · SELinnaeus University · SEUppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Behavioral eHealth interventions can enhance self-management and improve well-being in people with chronic pain. The development of these interventions calls for a user-centered approach to ensure that patient needs are appreciated. However, it may be challenging to involve patients; particularly during the early stages of the process. Fictional user profiles, known as Methods: Bibliographic databases (Medline, Web of Science Core Collection, PsycInfo, CINAHL) and registries (PubMed Central, medaRxiv) were systematically searched. In a double-reviewing process, Findings: Ten studies reported using "Pain Personas" in the development of eHealth interventions for such purposes as to gain a shared understanding of the user and to discuss solutions in team meetings, or for patients to identify with (if Personas are included in the intervention). Personas were based on qualitative and/or quantitative data. However, the procedure for creating Personas was only described in half of the included studies ( Conclusions: Although Personas have been used by pain researchers in recent projects and were highlighted as an important ingredient in the development process, available design guidelines for the creation and use of Personas are not followed or communicated transparently. Benefits and challenges when using Personas in the development of eHealth interventions for people with chronic pain are discussed to support future eHealth efforts and to improve the quality of eHealth innovation in the field of pain.

Indexed as

Chronic painDevelopmentInternetInterventionPersonasUser research

Identifiers

PMID37273935
PMCPMC10235431
OpenAlexW4362589875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.