Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37273931›Full record

ArticleInternet interventions2023

The effectiveness of three mobile-based psychological interventions in reducing psychological distress and preventing stress-related changes in the psycho-neuro-endocrine-immune network in breast cancer survivors: Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Miroslav Světlák, Tatiana Malatincová, Jana Halámková, Zdeňka Barešová, Monika Lekárová, Dana Vigašová, Alena Slezáčková, Rastislav Šumec, Pavel Humpolíček, Jiří Šedo and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Internet interventions, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Miroslav SvětlákDepartment of Medical Psychology and Psychosomatics, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, 63900 Brno, Czech Republic.
Tatiana MalatincováDepartment of Medical Psychology and Psychosomatics, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, 63900 Brno, Czech Republic.
Jana HalámkováDepartment of Comprehensive Cancer Care, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Žlutý Kopec 7, 65653 Brno, Czech Republic.
Zdeňka BarešováDepartment of Medical Psychology and Psychosomatics, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, 63900 Brno, Czech Republic.
Monika LekárováDepartment of Medical Psychology and Psychosomatics, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, 63900 Brno, Czech Republic.
Dana VigašováDepartment of Medical Psychology and Psychosomatics, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, 63900 Brno, Czech Republic.
Alena SlezáčkováDepartment of Medical Psychology and Psychosomatics, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, 63900 Brno, Czech Republic.
Rastislav ŠumecDepartment of Medical Psychology and Psychosomatics, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, 63900 Brno, Czech Republic.
Pavel HumpolíčekDepartment of Medical Psychology and Psychosomatics, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, 63900 Brno, Czech Republic.
Jiří ŠedoDepartment of Comprehensive Cancer Care, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Žlutý Kopec 7, 65653 Brno, Czech Republic.
Jan ChládekThe First Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University and St. Anne's University Hospital, Pekařská 53, 60500 Brno, Czech Republic.
Robert RomanDepartment of Medical Psychology and Psychosomatics, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, 63900 Brno, Czech Republic.
Jana GottwaldováDepartment of Comprehensive Cancer Care, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Žlutý Kopec 7, 65653 Brno, Czech Republic.
Lenka GescheidtováDepartment of Comprehensive Cancer Care, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Žlutý Kopec 7, 65653 Brno, Czech Republic.
Zdeňka ČermákováDepartment of Comprehensive Cancer Care, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Žlutý Kopec 7, 65653 Brno, Czech Republic.
Vojtěch ThonDepartment of Studies Design and Data Management, RECETOX, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kamenice 34, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic.
Iva HrnčiříkováDepartment of Comprehensive Cancer Care, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Žlutý Kopec 7, 65653 Brno, Czech Republic.
Tomáš KazdaDepartment of Comprehensive Cancer Care, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Žlutý Kopec 7, 65653 Brno, Czech Republic.
Marek SvobodaDepartment of Comprehensive Cancer Care, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Žlutý Kopec 7, 65653 Brno, Czech Republic.
Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute · CZMasaryk University · CZSt. Anne's University Hospital Brno · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: A growing body of literature shows that psychological distress is not only a major threat to psychological well-being but can also have a significant impact on physical health. In cancer patients, it can negatively affect prognosis and posttreatment recovery processes. Since face-to-face psychological interventions are often inaccessible to cancer patients, researchers have recently been focusing on the effectiveness of eHealth adaptations of well-established approaches. In this context, there has been a call for high-quality randomised controlled trials that would allow for a direct comparison of different approaches, potentially addressing different needs and preferences of patients, and also for more systematic research focusing on how psychological interventions affect not only psychological but also biological markers of stress. Both of these questions are addressed in the present study. Methods: A randomised controlled trial will be carried out to test and compare the effectiveness of three eight-week eHealth programmes for the mental health support of cancer patients. All programmes will be delivered through the same application for mobile devices MOU MindCare. Discussion: This trial is unique in comparing three different eHealth interventions for cancer patients based on three well-established approaches to mental health support delivered on the same platform. The study will allow us to examine whether different types of interventions affect different indicators of mental health. In addition, it will provide valuable data regarding the effects of stress-reducing psychological interventions on the biomarkers of stress playing an essential role in cancer recovery processes and general health.

Indexed as

Autogenic trainingBiomarkers of stresse-mental healthMindfulness-based interventionPositive psychology interventionPsycho-oncology

Identifiers

PMID37273931
PMCPMC10235427
OpenAlexW4372231620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.