ArticleAsia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing2023
Psychometric validation of the modified Chinese version of the personalized psychological flexibility index in patients with cancer.
Article in Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Relationship between obsessive personality traits and eating disorders.Eating and weight disorders : EWD · 2026Article
- Psychometric validation of the Chinese version of the Edmonton-33 scale in patients with head and neck cancer.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2025Article
- Reliability and validity of the Mentalization Questionnaire in a potentially depressed group of Chinese college students.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- The effects of psychological flexibility and night shifts on mental health and well-being in nurses.PloS one · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to perform across-cultural adaptation of the English version of the personalized psychological flexibility index (PPFI) into Chinese, and to evaluate its psychometric properties in patients with cancer. Methods: This study was conducted in two phases. In phase 1, we followed Beaton's guidelines for cross-cultural adaptation of PPFI. In phase 2, we conducted a cross-sectional study to assess the validity and reliability of the PPFI among a total of 455 patients with cancer in Hunan Province of China. Item analysis was used to evaluate and screen items, while content validity, construct validity, convergent validity, and concurrent validity were used to evaluate the validity. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach's ɑ coefficient, retest reliability, and composite reliability. Results: The item-level content validity index of the modified Chinese version of PPFI (PPFI-C) ranged from 0.89 to 1.00, the scale-level CVI/universal agreement was 0.87, and the S-CVI/average was 0.99. Exploratory factor analysis identified a 14-item, three-factor structure of PPFI (item 11 deleted). Confirmatory factor analysis showed χ Conclusions: The results suggest that the 14-item PPFI-C is a reliable and valid tool for measuring PF in Chinese patients with cancer. However, additional studies are needed to validate the psychometric properties of PPFI-C in other populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.