Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37273793›Full record

ReviewMaterials today. Bio2023

Multifunctional nanostructures: Intelligent design to overcome biological barriers.

Mehdi Azizi, Rana Jahanban-Esfahlan, Hadi Samadian, Masoud Hamidi, Khaled Seidi, Alireza Dolatshahi-Pirouz, Amirhossein Ahmadieh Yazdi, Amin Shavandi, Sophie Laurent, Mahsa Be Omide Hagh and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials today. Bio, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Special Issue "Biopolymers in Drug and Gene Delivery Systems 3.0".International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Mehdi AziziDepartment of Tissue Engineering and Biomaterials, School of Advanced Medical Sciences and Technologies, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
Rana Jahanban-EsfahlanDepartment of Medical Biotechnology, School of Advanced Medical Sciences, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Hadi SamadianDental Implants Research Center, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
Masoud HamidiUniversité Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), École Polytechnique de Bruxelles-BioMatter Unit, Avenue F.D. Roosevelt, 50 - CP 165/61, 1050, Brussels, Belgium.
Khaled SeidiDepartment of Medical Biotechnology, School of Advanced Medical Sciences, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Alireza Dolatshahi-PirouzDepartment of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kgs, Lyngby, Denmark.
Amirhossein Ahmadieh YazdiDepartment of Molecular Medicine, School of Medicine, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
Amin ShavandiUniversité Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), École Polytechnique de Bruxelles-BioMatter Unit, Avenue F.D. Roosevelt, 50 - CP 165/61, 1050, Brussels, Belgium.
Sophie LaurentGeneral, Organic and Biomedical Chemistry Unit, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Research Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, University of Mons - UMONS, Mons, Belgium.
Mahsa Be Omide HaghImmunology Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Nahid KasaiyanDepartment of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508 GA, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Hélder A SantosDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Antonius Deusinglaan 1, 9713 AV, Groningen, Netherlands.
Mohammad-Ali ShahbaziDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Antonius Deusinglaan 1, 9713 AV, Groningen, Netherlands.
Hamedan University of Medical Sciences · IRTabriz University of Medical Sciences · IRUniversité Libre de Bruxelles · BEUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLTechnical University of Denmark · DKUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLUniversity of Mons · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past three decades, nanoscience has offered a unique solution for reducing the systemic toxicity of chemotherapy drugs and for increasing drug therapeutic efficiency. However, the poor accumulation and pharmacokinetics of nanoparticles are some of the key reasons for their slow translation into the clinic. The is intimately linked to the non-biological nature of nanoparticles and the aberrant features of solid cancer, which together significantly compromise nanoparticle delivery. New findings on the unique properties of tumors and their interactions with nanoparticles and the human body suggest that, contrary to what was long-believed, tumor features may be more mirage than miracle, as the enhanced permeability and retention based efficacy is estimated to be as low as 1%. In this review, we highlight the current barriers and available solutions to pave the way for approved nanoformulations. Furthermore, we aim to discuss the main solutions to solve inefficient drug delivery with the use of nanobioengineering of nanocarriers and the tumor environment. Finally, we will discuss the suggested strategies to overcome two or more biological barriers with one nanocarrier. The variety of design formats, applications and implications of each of these methods will also be evaluated.

Indexed as

Biological barriersBiotechnologyCancerNanoparticles engineeringNanotechnologyTargeted drug delivery

Identifiers

PMID37273793
PMCPMC10232915
OpenAlexW4377103532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.