ArticleJournal of blood medicine2023
A Single Center Study Investigating Clinical Outcomes of Testing for Multiple Myeloma and Immune Deficiency at Low Globulin Levels.
Article in Journal of blood medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of severe immunoparesis degree and duration on progression-free survival in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a retrospective cohort study of 258 patients.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Improving screening for antibody deficiency using calculated globulin and serum protein electrophoresis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Nonlinear Association Between Calculated Globulin Levels and 28-Day Mortality in Patients with Sepsis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Both primary (e.g. common variable immune deficiency, CVID) and secondary immune deficiency as well as multiple myeloma (MM) require medical intervention and treatment delay can exacerbate morbidity. This study investigated the potential importance of low levels of calculated globulin to detect immune deficiency and MM associated with immunoparesis (light chain, non-secretory MM). Methods: One hundred and thirty-nine patient serum samples from community physicians and outpatient clinics for liver function tests with low calculated globulin (<16 g/L, RR 18-37 g/L) levels were screened for immunoglobulins and protein electrophoresis. Further, 110 patients with globulin levels ≤16 g/L with screening for immunoglobulin levels and protein electrophoresis, requested through routine clinical care, were included in the analysis. Results: Approximately 47% of patients in this cohort had secondary antibody deficiency as a result of hematological malignancy. Secondary iatrogenic (immunosuppressants, antiepileptic drugs) immune deficiency was detected in 20% of patients and a significant percentage of the patients were found by reflex testing at globulin levels <16 g/L. During the study period the screening detected new light chain and non-secretory MM in 2.2% of patients. Three patients with CVID and six patients with light chain myeloma were previously detected by screening, consequently alerting clinicians and reducing delay in treatment. A further 23% with several co-morbid conditions showed unexpected hypogammaglobulinemia; in this category, the study identified a subgroup that required further investigation. Conclusion: Investigation of low globulin levels detects patients with primary and secondary immune deficiency and MM. Optimizing treatment for decreased immunoglobulins in patients with other clinical co-morbidities may require increased clinician awareness and watchful clinical and laboratory assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.