ReviewStructural heart : the journal of the Heart Team2022
Biomechanics of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Complications and Computational Predictive Modeling.
Review in Structural heart : the journal of the Heart Team, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prediction of Underexpansion Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation and Efficacy of Balloon Postdilatation.Structural heart : the journal of the Heart Team · 2026Article
- Understanding the mechanisms of TAVI durability through computational modelling: a multidisciplinary review.European heart journal. Digital health · 2026Review
- Computational modelling for personalized transcatheter aortic valve replacement planning: a systematic review of complications and decision support.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
- Considerations for Lifetime Management After TAVR or SAVR: When Bigger or Higher May Not Be Better.Structural heart : the journal of the Heart Team · 2025Article
- Credibility assessment of patient-specific modeling in transcatheter aortic valve implantation-Part 2: Uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis.APL bioengineering · 2025Article
- Transcatheter Aortic Valve Durability: Focus on Structural Valve Deterioration.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Review
- Multiscale modeling of drug-induced liver injury from organ to lobule.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Valve-in-Valve Repair in a Critically Ill Obstetric Patient with Severe Pulmonary Stenosis: A Rare Case.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Revolutionizing Cardiovascular Interventions With Artificial Intelligence.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2025Article
- Finite Element Analysis of Evolut Transcatheter Heart Valves: Effects of Aortic Geometries and Valve Sizes on Post-TAVI Wall Stresses and Deformations.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Accuracy of Three-Dimensional Neo Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Simulations With Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement in Different Mitral Phenotypes.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2025Article
- The Virtual Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (VTAVR) framework predicts optimal device landing zones tailored to patient-specific anatomy.npj biomedical innovations · 2025Article
- The emerging challenge ofClinical microbiology reviews · 2024Review
- A virtual scalable model of the Hepatic Lobule for acetaminophen hepatotoxicity prediction.NPJ digital medicine · 2024Article
- Sensitivity of Post-TAVR Hemodynamics to the Distal Aortic Arch Anatomy: A High-Fidelity CFD Study.Cardiovascular engineering and technology · 2024Article
- Design and Analysis of a Polymeric Left Ventricular Simulator via Computational Modelling.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Reduced Order Modeling for Real-Time Stent Deformation Simulations of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Prostheses.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2024Article
- The Current Landscape of Artificial Intelligence in Imaging for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.Current radiology reports · 2024Article
- Incremental prognostic value of intensity-weighted regional calcification scoring using contrast CT imaging in TAVR.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2023Article
- Long-term prognostic impact of paravalvular leakage on coronary artery disease requires patient-specific quantification of hemodynamics.Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a rapidly growing field enabling replacement of diseased aortic valves without the need for open heart surgery. However, due to the nature of the procedure and nonremoval of the diseased tissue, there are rates of complications ranging from tissue rupture and coronary obstruction to paravalvular leak, valve thrombosis, and permanent pacemaker implantation. In recent years, computational modeling has shown a great deal of promise in its capabilities to understand the biomechanical implications of TAVR as well as help preoperatively predict risks inherent to device-patient-specific anatomy biomechanical interaction. This includes intricate replication of stent and leaflet designs and tested and validated simulated deployments with structural and fluid mechanical simulations. This review outlines current biomechanical understanding of device-related complications from TAVR and related predictive strategies using computational modeling. An outlook on future modeling strategies highlighting reduced order modeling which could significantly reduce the high time and cost that are required for computational prediction of TAVR outcomes is presented in this review paper. A summary of current commercial/in-development software is presented in the final section.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.