Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37273562›Full record

ArticleJournal of food science and technology2023

"Optimization and evaluation of quality characteristics of traditional Indian snack (baked balls) made by using pumpkin peel powder".

Meenakshi Garg, Roshan Lal Yadav, Rajni Chopra, Balaram Pani, Vandana Sablania

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of food science and technology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Meenakshi GargBhaskaracharya College of Applied Sciences, University of Delhi, Dwarka, New Delhi 110075 India.
Roshan Lal YadavBhaskaracharya College of Applied Sciences, University of Delhi, Dwarka, New Delhi 110075 India.
Rajni ChopraNational Institute of Food Technology Entrepreneurship and Management, Kundli, Sonipat, Haryana India.
Balaram PaniBhaskaracharya College of Applied Sciences, University of Delhi, Dwarka, New Delhi 110075 India.
Vandana SablaniaInstitute of Home Economics, University of Delhi, Hauz Khas, New Delhi 110016 India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The baked balls (traditional Indian snack litti) were formulated along with the standardization and optimization of different ingredients and recipe. The optimization was done by using response surface methodology. Box behnken model was selected for the optimization in which wheat flour (40-80%), roasted bengal gram flour (10-50%), and pumpkin peel powder (2.5-15%) were selected as an independent factor for the standardization of baked balls recipe against the dependent factors including sensory attributes (colour and texture), moisture content and water activity. The proximate analysis of optimized baked balls resulted in energy, carbohydrate, protein, fat, dietary fibre, calcium, iron, and zinc value as 310 kcal, 55.6 g/100 g, 13.78 g/100 g, 2.73 g/100 g, 40.18 mg/100 g, 4.57 mg/100 g and 2.97 mg/100 g respectively. Additionally, carotenoid content of control and optimized baked balls was found to be 284 µg/100 g and 838.93 µg/100 g whereas the ascorbic acid content was observed as 1.84 mg/100 g and 5.82 mg/100 g respectively. It showed a significant increase in nutritional parameters when compared with control (wheat flour) baked balls. This study also evidenced that pumpkin peel powder can be used as a food supplement for various nutritional components.

Indexed as

Baked ballsBox behnken designCarotenoidsPumpkin peel powderSensory evaluation

Identifiers

PMID37273562
PMCPMC10232705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.