ArticlePeerJ2023
Does ankle push-off correct for errors in anterior-posterior foot placement relative to center-of-mass states?
Article in PeerJ, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of one night of sleep deprivation on single- and dual-task gait.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2026Article
- Effects of unexpected underfoot perturbations during turning on measures of mediolateral stability and corresponding recovery strategies.The Journal of experimental biology · 2026Article
- Probing gait adaptations: The impact of aging on dynamic stability and reflex control mechanisms under varied weight-bearing conditions.European journal of applied physiology · 2025Article
- Generalizability of foot placement control strategies during unperturbed and perturbed gait.Royal Society open science · 2024Article
- Tapping into the human spinal locomotor centres with transspinal stimulation.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Tapping Into the Human Spinal Locomotor Centres With Transspinal Stimulation.Research square · 2024Article
- Age-related differences in lower limb muscle activation patterns and balance control strategies while walking over a compliant surface.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Humans prioritize walking efficiency or walking stability based on environmental risk.PloS one · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding the mechanisms humans use to stabilize walking is vital for predicting falls in elderly. Modeling studies identified two potential mechanisms to stabilize gait in the anterior-posterior direction: foot placement control and ankle push-off control: foot placement depends on position and velocity of the center-of-mass (CoM) and push-off covaries with deviations between actual and predicted CoM trajectories. While both control mechanisms have been reported in humans, it is unknown whether especially the latter one is employed in unperturbed steady-state walking. Based on the finding of Wang and Srinivasan that foot placement deviates in the same direction as the CoM states in the preceding swing phase, and assuming that this covariance serves the role of stabilizing gait, the covariance between the CoM states and foot placement can be seen as a measure of foot placement accuracy. We subsequently interpreted the residual variance in foot placement from a linear regression model as "errors" that must be compensated, and investigated whether these foot placement errors were correlated to push-off kinetic time series of the subsequent double stance phase. We found ankle push-off torque to be correlated to the foot placement errors in 30 participants when walking at normal and slow speeds, with peak correlations over the double stance phase up to 0.39. Our study suggests that humans use a push-off strategy for correcting foot placement errors in steady-state walking.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.