ReviewAnnals of global health2023
The Devil they Knew: Chemical Documents Analysis of Industry Influence on PFAS Science.
Review in Annals of global health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pediatric effects of forever chemicals may last for a long time.Pediatric research · 2026Review
- Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) exposure profiles for pregnant women living in urban, rural, and remote areas of Suriname, South America suggest higher serum concentrations in remote rainforest communities.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2026Article
- Effects of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Compounds (PFASs) on Anaerobic Granular Sludge: Methane Production and Microbial Community Composition.Microbial ecology · 2026Article
- Addressing the Impacts of Water Insecurity on Infant Feeding: Policy Solutions for the US.Maternal & child nutrition · 2026Article
- Occupation and serum concentrations of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances: data from the 2013 to 2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.Annals of work exposures and health · 2026Article
- PFAS Toxicity: What's True, What's Not, and What Really Matters.Environmental science & technology · 2026Review
- Purdue's development of abuse-deterrent formulation opioids as a response to market competition: An industry documents analysis.SSM. Qualitative research in health · 2026Article
- QuEChERS-Based LC-MS/MS and HRMS Methods for PFAS Determination in Food: A Systematic Review.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) Alters the Structure of the Gut Microbial Community and Colonoid Transcription.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Article
- Trends in Organofluorine Chemistry Reveal Gaps in Knowledge on Environmental Persistence.Environmental science & technology · 2026Review
- New Mechanistic Evidence for Perfluorodecanoic Acid (PFDA) Teratogenicity via CYP26A1-Mediated Retinoic Acid Metabolism and Signaling.Chemical research in toxicology · 2026Article
- Perfluorooctane Sulfonate (PFOS) Disrupts Mitochondrial Activity and Cell Adhesion in Liver Cells.Journal of xenobiotics · 2026Article
- The Impact of Forever Chemicals on Protein Structure and Function.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Changes in the levels and predictors of per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances in maternal plasma, relative to timelines of EPA PFOA Stewardship.Environment international · 2025Article
- Ultrasound for degradation of complex matrices of PFAS mixtures.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2025Article
- Review
- Article
- Thermochemical Recycling and Degradation Strategies of Halogenated Polymers (F-, Cl-, Br-): A Holistic Review Coupled with Mechanistic Insights.Chemical record (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Review
- Scientists' warning: we must change paradigm for a revolution in toxicology and world food supply.Environmental sciences Europe · 2025Article
- Assessment of the Variability in the Occurrence of PFAS in Fish Tissues from Selected Fisheries in the Baltic Sea.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are a class of widely-used chemicals that persist in the environment and bioaccumulate in humans and animals, becoming an increasing cause for global concern. While PFAS have been commercially produced since the 1940s, their toxicity was not publicly established until the late 1990s. The objective of this paper is to evaluate industry documents on PFAS and compare them to the public health literature in order to understand this consequential delay. Methods: We reviewed a collection of previously secret industry documents archived at the UCSF Chemical Industry Documents Library, examining whether and how strategies of corporate manipulation of science were used by manufacturers of PFAS. Using well-established methods of document analysis, we developed deductive codes to assess industry influence on the conduct and publication of research. We also conducted a literature review using standard search strategies to establish when scientific information on the health effects of PFAS became public. Results: Our review of industry documents shows that companies knew PFAS was "highly toxic when inhaled and moderately toxic when ingested" by 1970, forty years before the public health community. Further, the industry used several strategies that have been shown common to tobacco, pharmaceutical and other industries to influence science and regulation - most notably, suppressing unfavorable research and distorting public discourse. We did not find evidence in this archive of funding favorable research or targeted dissemination of those results. Conclusions: The lack of transparency in industry-driven research on industrial chemicals has significant legal, political and public health consequences. Industry strategies to suppress scientific research findings or early warnings about the hazards of industrial chemicals can be analyzed and exposed, in order to guide prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.