Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37273280›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in behavioral neuroscience2023

Eye movements and ERP biomarkers for face processing problems in avoidant attachment-style individuals.

Simeng Gu, Yao Jiang, Mei Liu, Yumeng Li, Yuan Liang, Rou Feng, Minghong Xu, Fushun Wang, Jason H Huang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Simeng Gu *Department of Psychology, School of Medicine, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu, China.
Yao Jiang *Institute of Brain and Psychological Science, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Mei Liu *Institute of Brain and Psychological Science, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Yumeng LiDepartment of Psychology, School of Medicine, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu, China.
Yuan LiangInstitute of Brain and Psychological Science, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Rou FengInstitute of Brain and Psychological Science, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Minghong XuDepartment of Neurology, Lianyungang Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Fushun WangInstitute of Brain and Psychological Science, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Jason H HuangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Baylor Scott & White Health Center, Temple, TX, United States.
Sichuan Normal University · CNJiangsu University · CNBaylor Scott & White Medical Center - Temple · USNanjing University of Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Avoidant attachment poses a serious risk to intimate relationships and offspring. However, there are few studies on the face-processing characteristics and impairments of avoidant individuals based on basic emotion theory. Therefore, this study investigated the issues of emotional processing and deactivation strategies in individuals with avoidant attachment. Methods: Avoidant and secure individuals were recruited to participate in an eye-tracking experiment and a two-choice oddball task in which they had to distinguish facial expressions of basic emotions (sadness, anger, fear, disgust, and neutral). Eye fixation durations to various parts of the face, including the eyes, nose, and mouth, were measured, and three event-related potentials (ERP) components (P100, N170, and P300) were monitored. Results: Avoidant individuals could not process facial expressions as easily as secure individuals. Avoidant individuals focused less on the eyes of angry faces when compared to secure individuals. They also exhibited a more positive P100 component and a less negative N170 component when processing faces and a larger amplitude of the P300 component than secure individuals when processing emotional expressions. Conclusion: Avoidant individuals use deactivating strategies and exhibit specific characteristics at different stages, which are of great significance in social interaction.

Indexed as

avoidant attachmentdeactivating strategiesERPeye-trackingfacial expressionsMDD

Identifiers

PMID37273280
PMCPMC10235504
OpenAlexW4377139300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.