ReviewIndian journal of pediatrics2023
Radiological Imaging in Chest Diseases: Moving Away from Conventional Modes.
Review in Indian journal of pediatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Define, Determine, Deliberate, Debate, Discuss, Decide, and Deliver Evidence-informed Pediatric Pulmonology Care.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A chest radiograph is the most common and the initial radiological investigation for evaluating a child presenting with respiratory complaints. However, performing and interpreting chest radiography optimally requires training and skill. With the relatively easy availability of computed tomography (CT) scanning and more recently multidetector computed tomography (MDCT), these investigations are often performed. Although these can be the cross-sectional imaging modalities of choice in certain situations where detailed and exact anatomical and etiological information is required, both these investigations are associated with increased radiation exposure which has more detrimental effects on children, especially when repeated follow-up imaging is necessary to assess the disease status. Ultrasonography (USG) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have evolved as radiation-free radiological investigations for evaluating the pediatric chest pathologies over the last few years. In the present review article, the utility and the current status, as well as the limitations of USG and MRI for evaluation of pediatric chest pathologies, are discussed. Radiology has grown beyond having just the diagnostic capabilities in managing children with chest disorders in the last two decades. Image-guided therapeutic procedures (percutaneous and endovascular) are routinely performed in children with pathologies in the mediastinum and lungs. The commonly performed image-guided pediatric chest interventions, including biopsies, fine needle aspiration, drainage procedures and therapeutic endovascular procedures, are also discussed in the current review.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.