ArticleOdontology2024
A mechanical and three-dimensional finite element study of the optimum tooth sectioning depth during the extraction of low-level horizontally impacted mandibular third molar.
Article in Odontology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Clinical application and three-dimensional finite element analysis of along-axis extraction method in mandibular mesial and horizontally impacted third molar surgery].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2025Trial
- Optimal tooth sectioning using a surgical handpiece and elevator: a finite element study of horizontally deeply impacted mandibular third molars.Clinical oral investigations · 2024Article
- The effect of individual drilling sleeves on the precision of coronectomy tooth sections. An in vitro 3D-printed jaw model experiment.Clinical oral investigations · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The present study aims to determine the optimum sectioning depth for the extraction of low-level horizontally impacted mandibular third molar (LHIM3M) using mechanical and finite element analysis. One hundred and fifty extracted mandibular third molars were randomly divided into three groups: 1, 2 or 3 mm of tooth tissue was retained at the bottom of the crown. The breaking force of teeth was tested in a universal strength testing machine. The fracture surface was observed and the type of tooth breakage was recorded. According to the three groups, corresponding 3D finite element models were created. The breaking force obtained in the mechanical study was, respectively, applied and the stress and strain of the teeth and surrounding tissues were analysed. Breaking force decreased as sectioning depth increased. The 2 mm group produced the lowest rate of incomplete breakage (10%). In the 2 mm model, the stresses were evenly distributed in the tooth tissue at the bottom of the fissure, and the maximal stress was located in the tissue close to the root segment. The maximum values of stresses in the bone and of strains in the periodontal ligament of the second molar and bone were lower in the 1 mm model than in other models. Their distribution was similar in the three models. A sectioning depth of 1 mm group saves labour during the extraction of LHIM3M, compared to 2 and 3 mm; 2 mm might be the appropriate sectioning depth in terms of breakage shapes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37273122What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.