Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37273115›Full record

ArticleArchives of osteoporosis2023

A clinical prediction model for 10-year risk of self-reported osteoporosis diagnosis in pre- and perimenopausal women.

Jacob Zeitlin, Michael K Parides, Joseph M Lane, Linda A Russell, Kyle N Kunze

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of osteoporosis, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. AI's ongoing impact: Implications of AI's effects on health equity for women's healthcare providers.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jacob ZeitlinWeill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA. jhz4001@med.cornell.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6962-5100
Michael K ParidesDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.
Joseph M LaneDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.
Linda A RussellMetabolic Bone Health Center, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.
Kyle N KunzeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0363-3482
Hospital for Special Surgery · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A machine learning model using clinical, laboratory, and imaging data was developed to predict 10-year risk of menopause-related osteoporosis. The resulting predictions, which are sensitive and specific, highlight distinct clinical risk profiles that can be used to identify patients most likely to be diagnosed with osteoporosis. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to incorporate demographic, metabolic, and imaging risk factors into a model for long-term prediction of self-reported osteoporosis diagnosis.

methodsThis was a secondary analysis of 1685 patients from the longitudinal Study of Women's Health Across the Nation using data collected between 1996 and 2008. Participants were pre- or perimenopausal women between 42 and 52 years of age. A machine learning model was trained using 14 baseline risk factors-age, height, weight, body mass index, waist circumference, race, menopausal status, maternal osteoporosis history, maternal spine fracture history, serum estradiol level, serum dehydroepiandrosterone level, serum thyroid-stimulating hormone level, total spine bone mineral density, and total hip bone mineral density. The self-reported outcome was whether a doctor or other provider had told participants they have osteoporosis or treated them for osteoporosis.

resultsAt 10-year follow-up, a clinical osteoporosis diagnosis was reported by 113 (6.7%) women. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the model was 0.83 (95% confidence interval, 0.73-0.91) and Brier score was 0.054 (95% confidence interval, 0.035-0.074). Total spine bone mineral density, total hip bone mineral density, and age had the largest contributions to predicted risk. Using two discrimination thresholds, stratification into low, medium, and high risk, respectively, was associated with likelihood ratios of 0.23, 3.2, and 6.8. At the lower threshold, sensitivity was 0.81, and specificity was 0.82.

conclusionThe model developed in this analysis integrates clinical data, serum biomarker levels, and bone mineral densities to predict 10-year risk of osteoporosis with good performance.

Indexed as

OsteoporosisOsteoporosis, PostmenopausalAbsorptiometry, PhotonAdultBone DensityFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMiddle AgedModels, StatisticalPerimenopausePrognosisSelf ReportAgingBone mineral densityDXAEstrogenMenopauseScreening

Identifiers

PMID37273115
OpenAlexW4379377208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.