Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37272996›Full record

ArticleStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2024

Radiotherapy concepts for spinal metastases-results from an online survey among radiation oncologists of the German Society for Radiation Oncology.

Maria Waltenberger, Marco M E Vogel, Denise Bernhardt, Stefan Münch, Sophie Dobiasch, Kristin J Redmond, Simon S Lo, Güliz Acker, Michael G Fehlings, Florian Ringel and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Maria WaltenbergerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany. maria.waltenberger@mri.tum.de.ORCID 0000-0002-8064-0010
Marco M E VogelDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany.
Denise BernhardtDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany.
Stefan MünchDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany.
Sophie DobiaschDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany.
Kristin J RedmondDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.
Simon S LoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, USA.
Güliz AckerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health), Berlin, Germany.
Michael G FehlingsDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Florian RingelDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Peter VajkoczyDepartment of Neurosurgery, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health), Berlin, Germany.
Bernhard MeyerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany.
Stephanie E CombsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany.
TUM Klinikum · DEGerman Cancer Research Center · DEHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DEJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEJohns Hopkins University · USUniversity of Toronto · CAUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSpinal metastases (SM) are a common radiotherapy (RT) indication. There is limited level I data to drive decision making regarding dose regimen (DR) and target volume definition (TVD). We aim to depict the patterns of care for RT of SM among German Society for Radiation Oncology (DEGRO) members.

methodsAn online survey on conventional RT and Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) for SM, distributed via e‑mail to all DEGRO members, was completed by 80 radiation oncologists between February 24 and April 29, 2022. Participation was voluntary and anonymous.

resultsA variety of DR was frequently used for conventional RT (primary: n = 15, adjuvant: n = 14). 30 Gy/10 fractions was reported most frequently. TVD in adjuvant RT was heterogenous, with a trend towards larger volumes. SBRT was offered in 65% (primary) and 21% (adjuvant) of participants' institutions. A variety of DR was reported (primary: n = 40, adjuvant: n = 27), most commonly 27 Gy/3 fractions and 30 Gy/5 fractions. 59% followed International Consensus Guidelines (ICG) for TVD.

conclusionWe provide a representative depiction of RT practice for SM among DEGRO members. DR and TVD are heterogeneous. SBRT is not comprehensively practiced, especially in the adjuvant setting. Further research is needed to provide a solid data basis for detailed recommendations.

Indexed as

Radiation OncologyRadiosurgerySpinal NeoplasmsHumansRadiation OncologistsSurveys and QuestionnairesOnline surveyPalliationPatterns of careRadiotherapySBRTSpinal metastases

Identifiers

PMID37272996
PMCPMC10805849
OpenAlexW4379375961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.