Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37272990›Full record

ReviewOrthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany)2023

[The first decade of the DGOU's cartilage register-insights for clinical practice].

Johannes Weishorn, Alexander Bumberger, Philipp Niemeyer, Thomas Tischer, Ralf Mueller-Rath, Tobias Renkawitz, Yannic Bangert

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Johannes WeishornOrthopädische Universitätsklinik Heidelberg, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Schlierbacher Landstr. 200a, 69118, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
Alexander BumbergerOCM Orthopädische Chirurgie München, München, Deutschland.
Philipp NiemeyerOCM Orthopädische Chirurgie München, München, Deutschland.
Thomas TischerMalteser Waldkrankenhaus St. Marien, Erlangen, Deutschland.
Ralf Mueller-RathOPND Orthopädische Praxisklinik, Neuss und Düsseldorf, Deutschland.
Tobias RenkawitzOrthopädische Universitätsklinik Heidelberg, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Schlierbacher Landstr. 200a, 69118, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
Yannic BangertOrthopädische Universitätsklinik Heidelberg, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Schlierbacher Landstr. 200a, 69118, Heidelberg, Deutschland. yannic.bangert@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
Heidelberg University · DEMalteser Waldkrankenhaus Erlangen · DEOrthopädische Praxis · DEOrthopädische Universitätsklinik · DEUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DEUniversity of Freiburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRegistry data provide valuable epidemiological insights that help to further improve process and outcome quality in patient care. The German Cartilage Registry (KnorpelRegister DGOU) was established in 2013 as an instrument for quality assurance after surgical cartilage regenerative procedures on hip, knee and ankle joints. DATA COLLECTION: Participation in the German Cartilage Registry is optional for hospitals and practices. Currently, more than 160 institutions in Germany, Austria and Switzerland participate in the data collection. DATA COLLECTED AND INITIAL

findingsThe implementation of PROMs ("patient related outcome measurement"), as well as the recording of surgery-related influencing factors, enable a differentiated scientific analysis and represent a key quality feature of the registry. Initial analyses of the registry data have already provided clinically relevant findings for immediate patient care. For example, patients who underwent focal cartilage therapy prior to ACT show a clinically relevant, significantly worse outcome than patients who underwent primary ACT. First conclusions could also be drawn regarding the relevance of concomitant cartilage therapy. For example, in patients with focal cartilage damage of the medial knee joint compartment, registry data indicate that leg axis correction is indicated even in cases of mild deviation of the mechanical leg axis.

conclusionThe data and findings obtained from the Cartilage Registry represent an important aspect of clinical care research and serve as a complement to well-designed, clinically prospective cohort studies, RCTs, and meta-analyses.

Indexed as

Cartilage, ArticularCartilage DiseasesAnkle JointHumansKnee JointProspective StudiesAnkleArthroscopyHipKneeRegistries

Identifiers

PMID37272990
OpenAlexW4379375901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.