Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37272951›Full record

SynthesisEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2023

Pain management following septorhinoplasty surgery: evidence from a systematic review.

Arman Shafiee, Razman Arabzadeh Bahri, Mohammad Mobin Teymouri Athar, Maryam Beiky, Omid Rostaii, Golshid Golpayegani, Faeze Soltani Abhari

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Arman ShafieeDepartment of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran. armanshafieemd@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1941-4399
Razman Arabzadeh BahriTehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad Mobin Teymouri AtharShahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Maryam BeikyStudent Research Committee, School of Medicine, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran.
Omid RostaiiStudent Research Committee, School of Medicine, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran.
Golshid GolpayeganiStudent Research Committee, School of Medicine, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran.
Faeze Soltani AbhariIslamic Azad University Pharmaceutical Sciences Branch, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe investigated recent evidence on the analgesics available for postoperative pain management among patients undergoing septoplasty or rhinoplasty surgery.

methodsStudies were retrieved from MEDLINE (through PubMed), Web of Science, and Embase up to 3 August 2022.

resultsForty-seven studies including 3717 patients were included. There were 45 randomized clinical trials and 2 observational cohort studies. Most of the studies were recently published and conducted in Turkey (n = 27). The majority of the studies performed the intervention preoperatively (n = 26), 11 studies postoperatively, 6 studies intraoperative, 2 studies preoperative plus intraoperative, and 2 studies performed the intervention with preoperative plus postoperative timing. The most evaluated medication was lidocaine (n = 10), followed by levobupivacaine (n = 4), and gabapentin (n = 4). Regarding post-operative pain assessment, the most used scale was the visual analog scale (VAS) (n = 36). Compared to controls, almost all interventions showed a significant benefit in managing post-operative pain. Although it should be mentioned regarding the comparison between opioids and NSAIDs consumption after surgery for pain management, most studies did not show a significant difference between the groups. No major side effects except nausea and vomiting were observed among the reviewed studies.

conclusionThis study summarized the most recent options that are available to manage pain following septorhinoplasty surgery. Recent investigations showed local interventions vs pre/post-operative analgesic medications are highly suggested to be replaced with opioids and NSAIDs as they have shown prominent efficacy with no significant adverse events. Future research is advised to determine the best dosage and administration techniques.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidRhinoplastyAnalgesicsAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalHumansPain ManagementPostoperative PainAnalgesicsAnalgesics, OpioidAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalPainPain managementRhinoplastySeptoplasty

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.