Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37272639›Full record

ArticleThe journal of international advanced otology2023

A Computer Vision Algorithm to Classify Pneumatization of the Mastoid Process on Temporal Bone Computed Tomography Scans.

Zubair Hasan, Michael Lee, Fiona Chen, Seraphina Key, Al-Rahim Habib, Layal Aweidah, Raymond Sacks, Narinder Singh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of international advanced otology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Quantitative Analysis of Cochlear-Carotid Recesses Based on HRCT in Endoscope-Assisted Management of Massive Petrous Bone Cholesteatoma.Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Zubair HasanUniversity of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, New South Wales, Australia;Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Westmead Hospital, New South.
Michael LeeDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Westmead Hospital, New South Wales, Australia.
Fiona ChenDepartment of Otolaryngology Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Seraphina KeyMonash University, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Victoria, Australia.
Al-Rahim HabibUniversity of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, New South Wales, Australia;Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Westmead Hospital, New South.
Layal AweidahUniversity of Notre Dame, Faculty of Medicine, New South Wales, Australia.
Raymond SacksUniversity of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, New South Wales, Australia; Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Concord Hospital, New South Wales, Australia.
Narinder SinghUniversity of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, New South Wales, Australia;Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Westmead Hospital, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPneumatization of the mastoid process is variable and of significance to the operative surgeon. Surgical approaches to the temporal bone require an understanding of pneumatization and its implications for surgical access. This study aims to determine the feasibility of using deep learning convolutional neural network algorithms to classify pneumatization of the mastoid process.

methodsDe-identified petrous temporal bone images were acquired from a tertiary hospital radiology picture archiving and communication system. A binary classification mode in the pretrained convolutional neural network was used to investigate the utility of convolutional neural networks in temporal bone imaging. False positive and negative images were reanalyzed by the investigators and qualitatively assessed to consider reasons for inaccuracy.

resultsThe overall accuracy of the model was 0.954. At a probability threshold of 65%, the sensitivity of the model was 0.860 (95% CI 0.783-0.934) and the specificity was 0.989 (95% CI 0.960-0.999). The positive predictive value was 0.973 (95% CI 0.904-0.993) and the negative predictive value was 0.935 (95% CI 0.901-0.965). The false positive rate was 0.006. The F1 number was 0.926 demonstrating a high accuracy for the model.

conclusionThe temporal bone is a complex anatomical region of interest to otolaryngologists. Surgical planning requires high-resolution computed tomography scans, the interpretation of which can be augmented with machine learning. This initial study demonstrates the feasibility of utilizing machine learning algorithms to discriminate anatomical variation with a high degree of accuracy. It is hoped this will lead to further investigation regarding more complex anatomical structures in the temporal bone.

Indexed as

MastoidTemporal BoneAlgorithmsComputersTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID37272639
PMCPMC10331717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.