ArticleBiotechnology and bioengineering2023
CHOmpact: A reduced metabolic model of Chinese hamster ovary cells with enhanced interpretability.
Article in Biotechnology and bioengineering, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparing kinetic versus stoichiometric priorities in hybrid models of CHO metabolism.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2026Article
- CellTarget: a convex optimisation approach to discover cellular objectives.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2026Article
- Wheels turning: CHO cell modeling moves into a digital biomanufacturing era: Subtitle: CHO Metabolic Modeling.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Review
- Cell specific perfusion rates drive growth dynamics and metabolism in CHO N-1 perfusion processes independent of perfusion rate control method.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Advancements in CHO metabolomics: techniques, current state and evolving methodologies.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Review
- CHOmpact: A reduced metabolic model of Chinese hamster ovary cells with enhanced interpretability.Biotechnology and bioengineering · 2023Article
- Towards advanced bioprocess optimization: A multiscale modelling approach.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Metabolic modeling has emerged as a key tool for the characterization of biopharmaceutical cell culture processes. Metabolic models have also been instrumental in identifying genetic engineering targets and developing feeding strategies that optimize the growth and productivity of Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. Despite their success, metabolic models of CHO cells still present considerable challenges. Genome-scale metabolic models (GeMs) of CHO cells are very large (>6000 reactions) and are difficult to constrain to yield physiologically consistent flux distributions. The large scale of GeMs also makes the interpretation of their outputs difficult. To address these challenges, we have developed CHOmpact, a reduced metabolic network that encompasses 101 metabolites linked through 144 reactions. Our compact reaction network allows us to deploy robust, nonlinear optimization and ensure that the computed flux distributions are physiologically consistent. Furthermore, our CHOmpact model delivers enhanced interpretability of simulation results and has allowed us to identify the mechanisms governing shifts in the anaplerotic consumption of asparagine and glutamate as well as an important mechanism of ammonia detoxification within mitochondria. CHOmpact, thus, addresses key challenges of large-scale metabolic models and will serve as a platform to develop dynamic metabolic models for the control and optimization of biopharmaceutical cell culture processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.