Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37271979›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2023

Effect of Cefoperazone/Sulbactam on Blood Coagulation Function in Infected Emergency Department Patients and the Necessity of Vitamin K1 (VK1) Preventive Intervention: A Single-Center, Retrospective Analysis.

Xupeng Shao, Yuanyuan Ren, Na Xie, Kailiang Fan, Haiyan Sun, Jiamin Lu, Jiuxiang Wei, Xincheng Tian

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Severe delayed coagulopathy caused by cefoperazone/sulbactam: A case report.The Journal of international medical research · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xupeng ShaoDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, China (mainland).
Yuanyuan RenDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, China (mainland).
Na XieDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, China (mainland).
Kailiang FanDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, China (mainland).
Haiyan SunDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, China (mainland).
Jiamin LuFirst Clinical Medical College, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, China (mainland).
Jiuxiang WeiFirst Clinical Medical College, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, China (mainland).
Xincheng TianFirst Clinical Medical College, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, China (mainland).
Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNShandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND Owing to its broad-spectrum antibacterial activity, strong antibacterial effects, and ß-lactamase stability, cefoperazone/sulbactam has been recognized as a first-line empirical drug for treating severe infections. However, its administration is also characterized by numerous adverse effects, including coagulation dysfunction. Here, we summarize past clinical treatment data to provide data support for clinical use of cefoperazone sulbactam. MATERIAL AND METHODS We retrospectively analyzed the clinical medical records of 820 patients treated with cefoperazone/sulbactam from January 2015 to December 2020. A retrospective cohort study design was used. We assessed the general data of patients, age and sex distribution, type of primary disease, and incidence and days of abnormal blood coagulation with cefoperazone sulbactam. The chi-square test and t test were used to analyze the effect of cefoperazone sulbactam on coagulation function and the effect of vitamin K intervention on prognosis. RESULTS The rate of coagulation dysfunction was 24.39% (200 patients). Among these 200 patients, 50 were treated with vitamin K1. With increasing patient age, the number of patients with cefoperazone/sulbactam-induced coagulation dysfunction increased (peak at 81-90 years). APACHE II of coagulation dysfunction (15.54±4.095) was significantly higher than that in the normal group. It occurred at days 2-19 after administration of 9.0 g/day of cefoperazone/sulbactam. Measured coagulation indices were significantly higher after treatment with cefoperazone/sulbactam than before treatment, including international normalized ratio, prothrombin time, and activated partial thrombin time (P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS All coagulation indices decreased significantly after vitamin K1 intervention, indicating improved coagulation function, especially in patients with high APACHE II scores. Hence, regulated vitamin K1 administration can benefit patients with coagulation dysfunction in clinical treatment.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBlood CoagulationBlood Coagulation DisordersCefoperazoneSulbactamVitamin K 1AdultAgedAged, 80 and overEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesAnti-Bacterial AgentsCefoperazoneSulbactamVitamin K 1

Identifiers

PMID37271979
PMCPMC10251771
OpenAlexW4362637941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.