Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37271793›Full record

ReviewCurrent neurology and neuroscience reports2023

Medication Overuse Headache: an Updated Review and Clinical Recommendations on Management.

Megan A Hird, Claire H Sandoe

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The potential application of electrophysiological indicators in TMS treatment for MOH.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Megan A HirdDivision of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Claire H SandoeDivision of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. claire.sandoe@wchospital.ca.
University of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

overviewMedication overuse headache (MOH) is highly prevalent among individuals with primary headache disorders. PURPOSE OF REVIEW: (1) Provide an update on epidemiology, risk factors, and treatment strategies of MOH and (2) provide recommendations on the management of MOH. RECENT

findingsThe prevalence of MOH ranges from 0.5 to 7.2%. Risk factors for MOH include female sex, lower socioeconomic status, some psychiatric conditions, and substance use disorders, among others. Recent large clinical trials support preventative therapy as an integral component of MOH management. Emerging clinical trial evidence supports anti-CGRP mAbs as effective preventative treatments among individuals with migraine and MOH. Among the large clinical trials, candesartan, topiramate, amitriptyline, and onabotulinumtoxinA were the most used preventative therapies, providing further support for these agents. MOH management requires a multifaceted and patient-centered approach that involves patient education, behavioral interventions, withdrawal of the overused medication, and initiation of preventative medication.

Indexed as

Headache Disorders, SecondaryMigraine DisordersAnalgesicsBehavior TherapyFemaleHumansPrevalenceRisk FactorsAnalgesicsHeadacheMedication overusePreventativeWithdrawal

Identifiers

PMID37271793
OpenAlexW4379348332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.