Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37271780›Full record

SynthesisHeart failure reviews2023

High-intensity interval training versus moderate-intensity continuous training in patients with heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Masatsugu Okamura, Masashi Shimizu, Shuhei Yamamoto, Kenichi Nishie, Masaaki Konishi

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Heart failure reviews, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Exercise snacks and physical fitness in sedentary populations.Sports medicine and health science · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Masatsugu OkamuraBerlin Institute of Health Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9136-5037
Masashi ShimizuDepartment of Rehabilitation, Osaka Metropolitan University Hospital, Osaka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9218-9634
Shuhei YamamotoDepartment of Rehabilitation, Shinshu University Hospital, Matsumoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0257-633X
Kenichi NishieDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Iida Municipal Hospital, Iida, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0171-0218
Masaaki KonishiDepartment of Medical Science and Cardiorenal Medicine, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-Ward, Yokohama, 236-0004, Japan. m_koni@yokohama-cu.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-3020-7526
Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEIkeda Municipal Hospital · JPOsaka Metropolitan University · JPShinshu University Hospital · JPYokohama City University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effects of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) in patients with heart failure (HF) remain controversial. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to examine the efficacy of HIIT versus moderate-intensity continuous aerobic training (MCT) on exercise tolerance in patients with HF. We searched for studies published up to 4 March 2022 in Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library with no limitations on data, language, or publication status. We included randomized controlled trials comparing the efficacy of HIIT and MCT on peak oxygen uptake (VO

Indexed as

Heart FailureHigh-Intensity Interval TrainingBody Mass IndexHumansBody mass indexCardiac rehabilitationCardiorespiratory fitnessExercise therapyHeart failureHigh-intensity interval training

Identifiers

PMID37271780
OpenAlexW4379375993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.