Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37271757›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

AMST

Hasil Park, Injae Lee, Dasol Jeong, Joonki Paik

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hasil ParkDepartment of Image, Chung-Ang University, 84 Heukseok-ro, Seoul, 06974, Korea.
Injae LeeDepartment of Artificial Intelligence, Chung-Ang University, 84 Heukseok-ro, Seoul, 06974, Korea.
Dasol JeongDepartment of Image, Chung-Ang University, 84 Heukseok-ro, Seoul, 06974, Korea.
Joonki PaikDepartment of Image, Chung-Ang University, 84 Heukseok-ro, Seoul, 06974, Korea. paikj@cau.ac.kr.

Funding

Institute of Information & Communications Technology Planning & Evaluation 2021-0-01341National Research Foundation of Korea 2021M3I1A1097911
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, many existing visual trackers have made significant progress by incorporating either spatial information from multi-level convolution layers or temporal information for tracking. However, the complementary advantages of both spatial and temporal information cannot be leveraged when these two types of information are used separately. In this paper, we present a new approach for robust visual tracking using a transformer-based model that incorporates both spatial and temporal context information at multiple levels. To integrate the refined similarity maps through multi-level spatial and temporal encoders, we propose an aggregation encoder. Consequently, the output of the proposed aggregation encoder contains useful features that integrate the global contexts of multi-level spatial and the temporal contexts. The feature we propose offers a contrasting yet complementary representation of multi-level spatial and temporal contexts. This characteristic is particularly beneficial in complex aerial scenarios, where tracking failures can occur due to occlusion, motion blur, small objects, and scale variations. Also, our tracker utilizes a light-weight network backbone, ensuring fast and effective object tracking in aerial datasets. Additionally, the proposed architecture can achieve more robust object tracking against significant variations by updating the features of the latest object while retaining the initial template information. Extensive experiments on seven challenging short-term and long-term aerial tracking benchmarks have demonstrated that the proposed tracker outperforms state-of-the-art tracking methods in terms of both real-time processing speed and performance.

Identifiers

PMID37271757
PMCPMC10239757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.