Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37271515›Full record

SynthesisJournal of veterinary science2023

Prevalence of Senecavirus A in pigs from 2014 to 2020: a global systematic review and meta-analysis.

Xuhua Ran, Zhenru Hu, Jun Wang, Zhiyuan Yang, Zhongle Li, Xiaobo Wen

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of veterinary science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Xuhua Ran *School of Animal Science and Technology, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3142-0206
Zhenru Hu *School of Animal Science and Technology, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5656-4452
Jun WangCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University, Daqing 163319, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2883-7924
Zhiyuan YangCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University, Daqing 163319, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0211-8929
Zhongle LiCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130018, China. lzy1514316@126.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2137-9967
Xiaobo WenSchool of Animal Science and Technology, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China. xiaobo_wen@hainanu.edu.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7302-1596
Hainan University · CNHeilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University · CNJilin Agricultural University · CN

Funding

Agriculture Research System in Hainan Province HNARS2022-2-G4Intramural Project of Hainan University KYQD(ZR)20036Natural Science Foundation for the Excellent Scholars of Hainan Province of China 320RC461
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSenecavirus A (SVA), a member of the family

objectivesWe conducted a global meta-analysis and systematic review to determine the status of SVA infection in pigs.

methodsThrough PubMed, VIP Chinese Journals Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang Data search data from 2014 to July 26, 2020, a total of 34 articles were included in this analysis based on our inclusion criteria. We estimated the pooled prevalence of SVA in pigs by the random effects model. A risk of bias assessment of the studies and subgroup analysis to explain heterogeneity was undertaken.

resultsWe estimated the SVA prevalence to be 15.90% (1,564/9,839; 95% confidence interval [CI], 44.75-65.89) globally. The prevalence decreased to 11.06% (945/8,542; 95% CI, 28.25-50.64) after 2016. The highest SVA prevalence with the VP1-based RT-PCR and immunohistochemistry assay was 58.52% (594/1,015; 95% CI, 59.90-83.96) and 85.54% (71/83; 95% CI, 76.68-100.00), respectively. Besides, the SVA prevalence in piglet herds was the highest at 71.69% (119/166; 95% CI, 68.61-98.43) (

conclusionsThe results indicated that SVA widely exists in various countries currently. Therefore, more prevention and control policies should be proposed to enhance the management of pig farms and improve breeding conditions and the environment to reduce the spread of SVA.

Indexed as

PicornaviridaePicornaviridae InfectionsSwine DiseasesAnimalsPrevalenceSwinefeeding modelGeographic regionincidenceseneca valley virusswine

Identifiers

PMID37271515
PMCPMC10244137
OpenAlexW4378190410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.