ArticleExperimental hematology2023
Assay optimization for the objective quantification of human multilineage colony-forming units.
Article in Experimental hematology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reverse genetics in humanized mice reveals CARD8-mediated pyroptosis causing pancytopenia in human DPP9 deficiency.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2026Article
- Reverse genetics in humanized mice reveals CARD8-mediated pyroptosis causing pancytopenia in human DPP9 deficiency.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Ferrostatin-1 and hinokitiol supplementation enhance human hematopoietic stem cell expansion in a chemically defined medium.Molecular therapy. Advances · 2026Article
- The small-molecule Syk inhibitor R788 inhibits hematopoiesis and worsens anemia in sickle cell disease mice.Blood vessels, thrombosis & hemostasis · 2026Article
- Exploring a Flow Cytometry-Based CFU Assay for Functional Assessment of Human HSPCs: a Robust Alternative to Morphological Colony Evaluation.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2026Article
- Review
- An immunophenotype-coupled transcriptomic atlas of human hematopoietic progenitors.Nature immunology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Colony-forming unit (CFU) assays are a powerful tool in hematopoietic research because they allow researchers to functionally test the lineage potential of individual stem and progenitor cells. Assaying for lineage potential is important for determining and validating the identity of progenitor populations isolated by methods such as fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS). However, current methods for CFU assays are limited in their ability to robustly assay multipotent progenitors with the ability to differentiate down the myeloid, erythroid, and megakaryocytic lineages because of the lack of specific growth factors necessary for certain lineage outputs. In addition, manual counting of colony types is subjective resulting in user to user variability in assessments of cell types based on colony and cell morphologies. We demonstrate that the addition of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), macrophage (M)-CSF, and granulocyte-macrophage (GM)-CSF into a collagen-based MegaCult medium containing IL-3, IL-6, SCF, EPO, and TPO allows for the differentiation of common myeloid progenitors into expected proportions of colonies containing granulocytic (G), monocytic (M), erythroid (E), and megakaryocytic (Mk) cells. Additionally, we demonstrate an objective method using in situ immunofluorescence (IF) with anti-CD66b, anti-CD14, anti-CD235a, and anti-CD41 to detect G, M, E, and Mk cells, respectively. IF stained colonies can be analyzed individually at a microscope or using high-throughput microscopy. Thus, our improvements to the culture conditions and method for assay readout increase the accuracy, reproducibility, and throughput of the myeloid CFU assay.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.