Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37271014›Full record

ArticleCortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior2023

Benefit of visual speech information for word comprehension in post-stroke aphasia.

Anna Krason, Gabriella Vigliocco, Marja-Liisa Mailend, Harrison Stoll, Rosemary Varley, Laurel J Buxbaum

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Understanding discourse in face-to-face settings: The impact of multimodal cues and listening conditions.Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Multisensory and lexical information in speech perception.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Anna KrasonExperimental Psychology, University College London, UK; Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute, Elkins Park, PA, USA. Electronic address: anna.krason.15@ucl.ac.uk.
Gabriella ViglioccoExperimental Psychology, University College London, UK; Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute, Elkins Park, PA, USA.
Marja-Liisa MailendMoss Rehabilitation Research Institute, Elkins Park, PA, USA; Department of Special Education, University of Tartu, Tartu Linn, Estonia.
Harrison StollMoss Rehabilitation Research Institute, Elkins Park, PA, USA; Applied Cognitive and Brain Science, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Rosemary VarleyLanguage and Cognition, University College London, UK.
Laurel J BuxbaumMoss Rehabilitation Research Institute, Elkins Park, PA, USA; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Moss Rehabilitation Hospital · USThomas Jefferson University · USUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Postdoctoral Training in Translational Neurorehabilitation ResearchT32HD071844 · NICHD · ALBERT EINSTEIN HEALTHCARE NETWORK · PI WHYTE, JOHN · 2013 to 2022
$2.2M
NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD071844
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aphasia is a language disorder that often involves speech comprehension impairments affecting communication. In face-to-face settings, speech is accompanied by mouth and facial movements, but little is known about the extent to which they benefit aphasic comprehension. This study investigated the benefit of visual information accompanying speech for word comprehension in people with aphasia (PWA) and the neuroanatomic substrates of any benefit. Thirty-six PWA and 13 neurotypical matched control participants performed a picture-word verification task in which they indicated whether a picture of an animate/inanimate object matched a subsequent word produced by an actress in a video. Stimuli were either audiovisual (with visible mouth and facial movements) or auditory-only (still picture of a silhouette) with audio being clear (unedited) or degraded (6-band noise-vocoding). We found that visual speech information was more beneficial for neurotypical participants than PWA, and more beneficial for both groups when speech was degraded. A multivariate lesion-symptom mapping analysis for the degraded speech condition showed that lesions to superior temporal gyrus, underlying insula, primary and secondary somatosensory cortices, and inferior frontal gyrus were associated with reduced benefit of audiovisual compared to auditory-only speech, suggesting that the integrity of these fronto-temporo-parietal regions may facilitate cross-modal mapping. These findings provide initial insights into our understanding of the impact of audiovisual information on comprehension in aphasia and the brain regions mediating any benefit.

Indexed as

AphasiaSpeech PerceptionComprehensionHumansSpeechTemporal LobeAphasiaAudiovisual speechComprehensionLanguage

Identifiers

PMID37271014
PMCPMC10850036
OpenAlexW4376891508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.