Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37270809›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuromuscular diseases2023

Muscle Specific Promotors for Gene Therapy - A Comparative Study in Proliferating and Differentiated Cells.

Julienne Dietz, Frank Jacobsen, Heidi Zhuge, Nassam Daya, Anne Bigot, Wenli Zhang, Anja Ehrhardt, Matthias Vorgerd, Eric Ehrke-Schulz

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuromuscular diseases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Julienne DietzDepartment of Human Medicine, Institute of Virology and Microbiology, Center for Biomedical Education and Research (ZBAF), Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany.
Frank JacobsenDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Heimer Institute for Muscle Research, Bochum, Germany.
Heidi ZhugeDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Heimer Institute for Muscle Research, Bochum, Germany.
Nassam DayaDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Heimer Institute for Muscle Research, Bochum, Germany.
Anne BigotSorbonne Université, Inserm, Institut de Myologie, Centre de Recherche en Myologie, F-75013 Paris, France.
Wenli ZhangDepartment of Human Medicine, Institute of Virology and Microbiology, Center for Biomedical Education and Research (ZBAF), Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany.
Anja EhrhardtDepartment of Human Medicine, Institute of Virology and Microbiology, Center for Biomedical Education and Research (ZBAF), Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany.
Matthias VorgerdDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Heimer Institute for Muscle Research, Bochum, Germany.
Eric Ehrke-SchulzDepartment of Human Medicine, Institute of Virology and Microbiology, Center for Biomedical Education and Research (ZBAF), Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany.
BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil Bochum · DEWitten/Herdecke University · DEInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDepending on the therapy approach and disease background, the heterogeneity of muscular tissues complicates the development of targeted gene therapy, where either expression in all muscle types or restriction to only one muscle type is warranted. Muscle specificity can be achieved using promotors mediating tissue specific and sustained physiological expression in the desired muscle types but limited activity in non-targeted tissue. Several muscle specific promotors have been described, but direct comparisons between them are lacking.

objectiveHere we present a direct comparison of muscle specific Desmin-, MHCK7, microRNA206- and Calpain3 promotor.

methodsTo directly compare these muscle specific promotors we utilized transfection of reporter plasmids using an in vitro model based on electrical pulse stimulation (EPS) to provoke sarcomere formation in 2D cell culture for quantification of promotor activities in far differentiated mouse and human myotubes.

resultsWe found that Desmin- and MHCK7 promotors showed stronger reporter gene expression levels in proliferating and differentiated myogenic cell lines than miR206 and CAPN3 promotor. However, Desmin and MHCK7 promotor promoted gene expression also cardiac cells whereas miR206 and CAPN3 promotor expression was restricted to skeletal muscle.

conclusionsOur results provides direct comparison of muscle specific promotors with regard to expression strengths and specificity as this is important feature to avoid undesired transgene expression in non-target muscle cells for a desired therapy approach.

Indexed as

MicroRNAsMuscle, SkeletalAnimalsCell DifferentiationDesminGenetic TherapyHumansMicePromoter Regions, GeneticDesminMicroRNAsMIRN206 microRNA, humanMirn206 microRNA, mousegene therapyMusclepromotortargeted expression

Identifiers

PMID37270809
PMCPMC10357164
OpenAlexW4379229700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.