Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37270698›Full record

Trial reportJAMA oncology2023

Tepotinib Treatment in Patients With MET Exon 14-Skipping Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Long-term Follow-up of the VISION Phase 2 Nonrandomized Clinical Trial.

Julien Mazieres, Paul K Paik, Marina C Garassino, Xiuning Le, Hiroshi Sakai, Remi Veillon, Egbert F Smit, Alexis B Cortot, Jo Raskin, Santiago Viteri and 12 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT02864992 (A Phase II Single-arm Trial to Investigate Tepotinib in Advanced), which is not on this map. Cited by 88 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
88citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
23.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02864992 phase2active not recruitingnot on this map

A Phase II Single-arm Trial to Investigate Tepotinib in Advanced (Locally Advanced or Metastatic) Non-small Cell Lung Cancer With METex14 Skipping Alterations or MET Amplification (VISION)

TypeinterventionalSponsorEMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc.Ran2016 to 2026Enrolled337ConditionsAdvanced (Stage IIIB/IV) Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) With MET Exon 14 (METex14) Skipping Alterations or MET Amplification, Lung Adenocarcinoma Stage IIIB/IVArmsTepotinib
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

88 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Liquid and Tissue Biopsies for Identifying MET Exon 14 Skipping NSCLC: Analyses from the Phase II VISION Study of Tepotinib.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025
    Trial
  4. Vebreltinib for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Harboring c-Met Exon 14 Skipping Mutation: A Multicenter, Single-Arm, Phase II KUNPENG Study.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2024
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Pharmacogenomics in oncology: mutation-targeted therapy and biomarker integration in non-small cell lung cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 18 institutions in 11 countries.

Julien MazieresCHU de Toulouse, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France.
Paul K PaikThoracic Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Marina C GarassinoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Xiuning LeDepartment of Thoracic Head and Neck Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Hiroshi SakaiDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, Saitama Cancer Center, Kitaadachi-gun, Japan.
Remi VeillonCHU Bordeaux, service des maladies respiratoires, Bordeaux, France.
Egbert F SmitDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Alexis B CortotUniv. Lille, CHU Lille, CNRS, Inserm, Institut Pasteur de Lille, UMR9020 - UMR-S 1277 - Canther, Lille, France.
Jo RaskinDepartment of Pulmonology and Thoracic Oncology, Antwerp University Hospital (UZA), Edegem, Belgium.
Santiago ViteriInstituto Oncológico Dr. Rosell, Hospital Universitario Dexeus, Grupo Quiron Salud, Barcelona, Spain.
Yi-Long WuGuangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital & Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
James C H YangDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Taiwan University Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan.
Myung-Ju AhnDivision of Hematology Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Rui MaMedical Oncology Department of Thoracic Cancer, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
Jun ZhaoDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China.
Aurora O'BrateGlobal Medical Affairs, the healthcare business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.
Karin BerghoffGlobal Patient Safety, the healthcare business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.
Rolf BrunsDepartment of Biostatistics, the healthcare business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.
Gordon OttoGlobal Clinical Development, the healthcare business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.
Andreas JohneGlobal Clinical Development, the healthcare business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.
Enriqueta FelipDepartment of Oncology, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain.
Michael ThomasThoraxklinik and National Center for Tumor Diseases at Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Merck (Germany) · DEAntwerp University Hospital · BECentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux · FRChina Medical University · CNCornell University · USGuangdong Academy of Medical Sciences · CNHeidelberg University · DEInstituto Oncológico Dr. Rosell · ESInstitut Pasteur de Lille · FRLeiden University Medical Center · NLNational Taiwan University · TWPeking University · CNSaitama Cancer Center · JPSungkyunkwan University · KRThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversité Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier · FRUniversity of Chicago · USVall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: MET inhibitors have recently demonstrated clinical activity in patients with MET exon 14 (METex14)-skipping non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, data with longer follow-up and in larger populations are needed to further optimize therapeutic approaches. Objective: To assess the long-term efficacy and safety of tepotinib, a potent and highly selective MET inhibitor, in patients with METex14-skipping NSCLC in the VISION study. Design, Setting, and Participants: The VISION phase 2 nonrandomized clinical trial was a multicohort, open-label, multicenter study that enrolled patients with METex14-skipping advanced/metastatic NSCLC (cohorts A and C) from September 2016 to May 2021. Cohort C (>18 months' follow-up) was an independent cohort, designed to confirm findings from cohort A (>35 months' follow-up). Data cutoff was November 20, 2022. Intervention: Patients received tepotinib, 500 mg (450 mg active moiety), once daily. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was objective response by independent review committee (RECIST v1.1). Secondary end points included duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: Cohorts A and C included 313 patients (50.8% female, 33.9% Asian; median [range] age, 72 [41-94] years). The objective response rate (ORR) was 51.4% (95% CI, 45.8%-57.1%) with a median (m)DOR of 18.0 (95% CI, 12.4-46.4) months. In cohort C (n = 161), an ORR of 55.9% (95% CI, 47.9%-63.7%) with an mDOR of 20.8 (95% CI, 12.6-not estimable [NE]) months was reported across treatment lines, comparable to cohort A (n = 152). In treatment-naive patients (cohorts A and C; n = 164), ORR was 57.3% (95% CI, 49.4%-65.0%) and mDOR was 46.4 (95% CI, 13.8-NE) months. In previously treated patients (n = 149), ORR was 45.0% (95% CI, 36.8%-53.3%) and mDOR was 12.6 (95% CI, 9.5-18.5) months. Peripheral edema, the most common treatment-related adverse event, occurred in 210 patients (67.1%) (35 [11.2%] experienced grade ≥3 events). Conclusions and Relevance: The findings from cohort C in this nonrandomized clinical trial supported the results from original cohort A. Overall, the long-term outcomes of VISION demonstrated robust and durable clinical activity following treatment with tepotinib, particularly in the treatment-naive setting, in the largest known clinical trial of patients with METex14-skipping NSCLC, supporting the global approvals of tepotinib and enabling clinicians to implement this therapeutic approach for such patients. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02864992.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsAgedExonsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMalePiperidinesPyridazinesPyrimidinesPiperidinesPyridazinesPyrimidinestepotinib

Identifiers

PMID37270698
PMCPMC10240398
OpenAlexW4379278548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.