Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37270657›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Predicting U.S. county opioid poisoning mortality from multi-modal social media and psychological self-report data.

Salvatore Giorgi, David B Yaden, Johannes C Eichstaedt, Lyle H Ungar, H Andrew Schwartz, Amy Kwarteng, Brenda Curtis

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06676059 (SMART-r), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06676059 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

SMART-r: Substance Monitoring and Active Relapse Tracking Repository

TypeobservationalSponsorNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)Ran2026 to 2044Enrolled10,000ConditionsAlcoholism, Substance-Related Disorders
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Salvatore GiorgiNational Institute on Drug Abuse, Intramural Research Program, Baltimore, MD, USA.
David B YadenDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Johannes C EichstaedtDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Lyle H UngarDepartment of Computer and Information Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
H Andrew SchwartzDepartment of Computer Science, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
Amy KwartengNational Institute on Drug Abuse, Intramural Research Program, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Brenda CurtisNational Institute on Drug Abuse, Intramural Research Program, Baltimore, MD, USA. brenda.curtis@nih.gov.
National Institute on Drug Abuse · USJohns Hopkins University · USStanford University · USStony Brook University · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Digital Markers in Relapse and RecoveryZIADA000628 · NIDA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE · PI CURTIS, BRENDA · 2019 to 2025
$10.0M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA DA000628
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Opioid poisoning mortality is a substantial public health crisis in the United States, with opioids involved in approximately 75% of the nearly 1 million drug related deaths since 1999. Research suggests that the epidemic is driven by both over-prescribing and social and psychological determinants such as economic stability, hopelessness, and isolation. Hindering this research is a lack of measurements of these social and psychological constructs at fine-grained spatial and temporal resolutions. To address this issue, we use a multi-modal data set consisting of natural language from Twitter, psychometric self-reports of depression and well-being, and traditional area-based measures of socio-demographics and health-related risk factors. Unlike previous work using social media data, we do not rely on opioid or substance related keywords to track community poisonings. Instead, we leverage a large, open vocabulary of thousands of words in order to fully characterize communities suffering from opioid poisoning, using a sample of 1.5 billion tweets from 6 million U.S. county mapped Twitter users. Results show that Twitter language predicted opioid poisoning mortality better than factors relating to socio-demographics, access to healthcare, physical pain, and psychological well-being. Additionally, risk factors revealed by the Twitter language analysis included negative emotions, discussions of long work hours, and boredom, whereas protective factors included resilience, travel/leisure, and positive emotions, dovetailing with results from the psychometric self-report data. The results show that natural language from public social media can be used as a surveillance tool for both predicting community opioid poisonings and understanding the dynamic social and psychological nature of the epidemic.

Indexed as

Social MediaAnalgesics, OpioidAnxietyHumansLanguageSelf ReportUnited StatesAnalgesics, Opioid

Identifiers

PMID37270657
PMCPMC10238775
OpenAlexW4379259931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.