Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37270556›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2023

Effect of bone cement augmentation with different configurations of the dual locking plate for femoral allograft fixation: finite element analysis and biomechanical study.

Taweechok Wisanuyotin, Permsak Paholpak, Winai Sirichativapee, Wilasinee Sirichativapee, Weerachai Kosuwon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Taweechok WisanuyotinDepartment of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand. tawwis@kku.ac.th.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4484-6468
Permsak PaholpakDepartment of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand.
Winai SirichativapeeDepartment of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand.
Wilasinee SirichativapeeDepartment of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand.
Weerachai KosuwonDepartment of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand.

Funding

Khon Kaen University IN64249
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsImplant failure in allograft reconstruction is one of the most common problems after treating a large bone defect for a primary bone tumor. The study aimed to investigate the effect of bone cement augmentation with different configurations of dual locking plates used for femoral allograft fixation.

methodsFour finite element (FE) models of the femur with a 1-mm bone gap were developed at the midshaft with different configurations of the 10-hole fixation dual locking plate (LP) with and without intramedullary bone cement augmentation. Model 1 was the dual LP at the lateral and medial aspect of the femur. Model 2 was Model 1 with bone cement augmentation. Model 3 was the dual LP at the anterior and lateral aspect of the femur. Finally, Model 4 was Model 3 with bone cement augmentation. All models were tested for stiffness under axial compression as well as torsional, lateral-medial, and anterior-posterior bending. In addition, the FE analyses were validated using biomechanical testing on a cadaveric femur.

resultsModel 2 had the greatest axial compression stiffness, followed by Models 1, 4, and 3. Bone cement augmentation in Models 2 and 4 had 3.5% and 2.4% greater axial stiffness than the non-augmentation Models 1 and 3, respectively. In the bone cement augmentation models, Model 2 had 11.9% greater axial compression stiffness than Model 4.

conclusionThe effect of bone cement augmentation increases construct stiffness less than the effect of the dual LP configuration. A dual lateral-medial LP with bone cement augmentation provides the strongest fixation of the femur in terms of axial compression and lateral bending stiffness.

Indexed as

Bone CementsFemoral FracturesAllograftsBiomechanical PhenomenaBone PlatesFemurFinite Element AnalysisFracture Fixation, InternalHumansBone CementsAllograftBiomechanical studyBone cementFemurFinite element analysisFixation

Identifiers

PMID37270556
PMCPMC10239087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.