Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37270472›Full record

Trial reportBMC anesthesiology2023

Opioid-free anesthesia with lidocaine for improved postoperative recovery in hysteroscopy: a randomized controlled trial.

N H Cha, Y Hu, G H Zhu, X Long, J J Jiang, Yuan Gong

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC anesthesiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Effect of opioid-freeBJA open · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

N H Cha *Institute of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Three Gorges University & Yichang Central People's Hospital, No. 183 Yiling Avenue, Wujiagang District, 443000, Yichang City, Hubei, China.
Y Hu *Institute of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Three Gorges University & Yichang Central People's Hospital, No. 183 Yiling Avenue, Wujiagang District, 443000, Yichang City, Hubei, China.
G H Zhu *Institute of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Three Gorges University & Yichang Central People's Hospital, No. 183 Yiling Avenue, Wujiagang District, 443000, Yichang City, Hubei, China.
X LongInstitute of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Three Gorges University & Yichang Central People's Hospital, No. 183 Yiling Avenue, Wujiagang District, 443000, Yichang City, Hubei, China.
J J JiangInstitute of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Three Gorges University & Yichang Central People's Hospital, No. 183 Yiling Avenue, Wujiagang District, 443000, Yichang City, Hubei, China.
Yuan GongInstitute of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Three Gorges University & Yichang Central People's Hospital, No. 183 Yiling Avenue, Wujiagang District, 443000, Yichang City, Hubei, China. gy-yc@163.com.
Yichang Central People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnesthesia with opioids negatively affects patients' quality of recovery. Opioid-free anesthesia attempts to avoid these effects. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of opioid-free anesthesia on the quality of recovery, using lidocaine on patients undergoing hysteroscopy.

methodsA parallel-group, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial was conducted in Yichang Central Peoples' Hospital, Hubei Province, China, from January to April, 2022. We included 90 female patients (age: 18-65 years, American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Class I-II) scheduled for elective hysteroscopy, 45 of whom received lidocaine (Group L), and 45 received sufentanil (Group S). Patients were randomly allocated to receive either lidocaine or sufentanil perioperatively. The primary outcome was the quality of postoperative recovery, which was assessed using the QoR-40 questionnaire (a patient-reported outcome questionnaire measuring the quality of recovery after surgery).

resultsThe two groups were similar in age, American Society of Anesthesiology physical status, height, weight, body mass index, and surgical duration. The QoR scores were significantly higher in Group L than Group S. The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, as well as the time to extubation were significantly lower in Group L than Group S.

conclusionOpioid-free anesthesia with lidocaine achieves a better quality of recovery, faster recovery, and a shorter time to extubation than general anesthesia with sufentanil.

trial registrationThe trial was registered on January 15, 2022 in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ( http://www.chictr.org.cn/showprojen.aspx?proj=149386 ), registration number ChiCTR2200055623.(15/01/2022).

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidAnesthesiologyAdolescentAdultAgedAnesthesia, GeneralDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansHysteroscopyLidocaineMiddle AgedPostoperative Nausea and VomitingPostoperative PainPregnancySufentanilAnalgesics, OpioidLidocaineSufentanilOpioid-free anesthesiaOpioidsPostoperative nausea and vomitingQuality of recovery (QoR)

Identifiers

PMID37270472
PMCPMC10239123
OpenAlexW4379259657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.