ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2023
Is robotic assistance more eye-catching than computer navigation in joint arthroplasty? A Google trends analysis from the point of public interest.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Perceptions of robot-assisted arthroplasty among patients and the public : a scoping review.Bone & joint open · 2026Pooled it
- Public information-seeking about orthopedic surgical robotics: a decade-scale infodemiological analysis and forecast through 2030.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- A comparative analysis of ChatGPT and Google in providing quality and clinical relevance of responses to patients' frequently asked questions on robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2025Article
- The future of robotic surgery in joint arthroplasty : Current platforms, emerging technologies and outlook for 2035.Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- [Perceptions, Expectations, and Barriers to Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Cross-Sectional Study of 218 Patients].Revista brasileira de ortopedia · 2025Article
- Perceptions, Expectations, and Barriers to Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Cross-Sectional Study of 218 Patients.Revista brasileira de ortopedia · 2025Article
- Adverse events related to robotic-assisted knee arthroplasty: a cross-sectional study from the MAUDE database.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Computer-assisted navigation system (CAS) and robotic assisted surgery (RAS) have been widely used in joint arthroplasty, but few studies focused on public interest. We aimed to evaluate current trend and seasonality of public interest in CAS and RAS arthroplasty over the past 10 years, and forecast the future development. All data related to CAS or RAS arthroplasty from January 2012 to December 2021 were collected through Google Trends. Public interest was described by relative search volume (RSV). Pre-existing trend was evaluated by linear and exponential models. Time series analysis and ARIMA model were utilized to analyze the seasonality and future trend. R software 3.5.0 was for statistics analysis. Public interest in RAS arthroplasty has been continuously increasing (P < 0.001) and exponential model (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.