Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37270441›Full record

ArticleOecologia2023

Year-round activity levels reveal diurnal foraging constraints in the annual cycle of migratory and non-migratory barnacle geese.

Michiel P Boom, Thomas K Lameris, Kees H T Schreven, Nelleke H Buitendijk, Sander Moonen, Peter P de Vries, Elmira Zaynagutdinova, Bart A Nolet, Henk P van der Jeugd, Götz Eichhorn

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oecologia, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Diel rhythmicity of activity and corticosterone metabolites in Arctic barnacle geese during breeding.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Michiel P BoomVogeltrekstation-Dutch Centre for Avian Migration and Demography (NIOO-KNAW), Wageningen, The Netherlands. c.boom@nioo.knaw.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6448-2446
Thomas K LamerisNIOZ Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research, Den Burg, The Netherlands.
Kees H T SchrevenDepartment of Animal Ecology, Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW), Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Nelleke H BuitendijkDepartment of Animal Ecology, Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW), Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Sander MoonenWageningen Environmental Reseach (WEnR), Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Peter P de VriesDepartment of Animal Ecology, Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW), Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Elmira ZaynagutdinovaDepartment of Vertebrate Zoology, Faculty of Biology, Saint Petersburg State University, St Petersburg, Russia.
Bart A NoletDepartment of Animal Ecology, Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW), Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Henk P van der Jeugd *Vogeltrekstation-Dutch Centre for Avian Migration and Demography (NIOO-KNAW), Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Götz Eichhorn *Vogeltrekstation-Dutch Centre for Avian Migration and Demography (NIOO-KNAW), Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Netherlands Institute of Ecology · NLInstitute for Biodiversity · DEInstitute of Avian Research · DERoyal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research · NLSt Petersburg University · RU

Funding

German Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Consumer Protection 406-04032/1-1502/1Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek ALWPP.2016.030Province of Fryslân 01443719
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Performing migratory journeys comes with energetic costs, which have to be compensated within the annual cycle. An assessment of how and when such compensation occurs is ideally done by comparing full annual cycles of migratory and non-migratory individuals of the same species, which is rarely achieved. We studied free-living migratory and resident barnacle geese belonging to the same flyway (metapopulation), and investigated when differences in foraging activity occur, and when foraging extends beyond available daylight, indicating a diurnal foraging constraint in these usually diurnal animals. We compared foraging activity of migratory (N = 94) and resident (N = 30) geese throughout the annual cycle using GPS-transmitters and 3D-accelerometers, and corroborated this with data on seasonal variation in body condition. Migratory geese were more active than residents during most of the year, amounting to a difference of over 370 h over an entire annual cycle. Activity differences were largest during the periods that comprised preparation for spring and autumn migration. Lengthening days during spring facilitated increased activity, which coincided with an increase in body condition. Both migratory and resident geese were active at night during winter, but migratory geese were also active at night before autumn migration, resulting in a period of night-time activity that was 6 weeks longer than in resident geese. Our results indicate that, at least in geese, seasonal migration requires longer daily activity not only during migration but throughout most of the annual cycle, with migrants being more frequently forced to extend foraging activity into the night.

Indexed as

GeeseThoracicaAnimal MigrationAnimalsSeasonsAnnual cycleDay lengthForagingMigrationResidency

Identifiers

PMID37270441
PMCPMC10307695
OpenAlexW4379260820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.