Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37270198›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Developing best practice principles for the provision of programs and services to people transitioning from custody to the community: study protocol for a modified Delphi consensus exercise.

Tazeen Majeed, Erica Breuer, Layla Edwards, Marc Remond, Jo Taylor, Reem Zeki, Stephen Hampton, Luke Grant, Juanita Sherwood, Eileen Baldry and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Tazeen MajeedCollege of Health Medicine and Wellbeing, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8512-3901
Erica BreuerCollege of Health Medicine and Wellbeing, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.
Layla EdwardsCollege of Health Medicine and Wellbeing, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.
Marc RemondCollege of Health Medicine and Wellbeing, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.
Jo TaylorCollege of Health Medicine and Wellbeing, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.
Reem ZekiCollege of Health Medicine and Wellbeing, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.
Stephen HamptonJustice Health and Forensic Mental Health Network, Matraville, New South Wales, Australia.
Luke GrantOffice of the Deputy Commissioner, Corrective Services NSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Juanita SherwoodCollege of Health Medicine and Wellbeing, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.
Eileen BaldrySchool of Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, UNSW Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Elizabeth SullivanCollege of Health Medicine and Wellbeing, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia e.sullivan@newcastle.edu.au.
University of Newcastle Australia · AUMental Health Australia · AUUniversity of Technology Sydney · AUUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThere is a lack of standard nomenclature and a limited understanding of programmes and services delivered to people in prisons as they transition into the community to support their integration and reduce reoffending related risk factors. The aim of this paper is to outline the protocol for a modified Delphi study designed to develop expert consensus on the nomenclature and best-practice principles of programmes and services for people transitioning from prison into the community. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: An online, two-phase modified Delphi process will be conducted to develop an expert consensus on nomenclature and the best-practice principles for these programmes. In the ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been received from the Justice Health and Forensic Mental Health Network Human Research Ethics Committee, the Aboriginal Health and Medical Research Council Human Research Ethics Committee, the Corrective Services New South Wales Ethics Committee and the University of Newcastle Human Research Ethics Committee. The results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publication.

Indexed as

PrisonersProgram EvaluationConsensusDelphi TechniqueHumansprotocols & guidelinespublic healthqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID37270198
PMCPMC10255081
OpenAlexW4379259755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.