Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37270179›Full record

ArticleBMJ open diabetes research & care2023

Non-efficacy of early intervention strategy for non-obese patients with early-onset gestational diabetes mellitus: solely based on the short-term outcomes.

Sayuri Nakanishi, Shigeru Aoki, Junko Kasai, Ryosuke Shindo, Soichiro Obata, Yoshimi Hasegawa, Aya Mochimaru, Kentaro Kurasawa, Etsuko Miyagi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open diabetes research & care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Sayuri NakanishiPerinatal Center for Maternity and Neonate, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3694-4340
Shigeru AokiPerinatal Center for Maternity and Neonate, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan smyyaoki@yahoo.co.jp.
Junko KasaiPerinatal Center for Maternity and Neonate, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.
Ryosuke ShindoPerinatal Center for Maternity and Neonate, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.
Soichiro ObataPerinatal Center for Maternity and Neonate, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.
Yoshimi HasegawaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Saiseikai Yokohamashi Nanbu Hospital, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.
Aya MochimaruDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fujisawa City Hospital, Fujisawa, Kanagawa, Japan.
Kentaro KurasawaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yokohama City University Hospital, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.
Etsuko MiyagiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yokohama City University Hospital, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.
Yokohama City University Medical Center · JPYokohama City University Hospital · JPFujisawa City Hospital · JPSaiseikai Ibaraki Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTo verify the effectiveness of intervention in early pregnancy for women with early-onset gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsThis study included women with a singleton pregnancy who were diagnosed with early-onset GDM by 20 weeks of gestation according to the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Group (IADPSG) threshold. We retrospectively evaluated the pregnancy outcomes in pregnant women with early-onset GDM. In the treatment from early pregnancy group (n=286), patients were diagnosed with early-onset GDM at the Yokohama City University Medical Center (YCU-MC) in 2015-2017 and were treated for GDM from early pregnancy. Concerning the treatment from mid-pregnancy group (n=248), participants were diagnosed with early-onset GDM at five sites, including the YCU-MC in 2018-2019, and were followed up without treatment until the second 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) at 24-28 weeks of gestation. Treatment for GDM was given only if the GDM pattern was still present in the second OGTT.

resultsThere were no significant differences in maternal backgrounds, including GDM risk factors and gestational weight gain, between the groups. Among the treatment from mid-pregnancy group, the false-positive early GDM was 124/248 (50%). Regarding pregnancy outcome, the rate of large for gestational age (LGA) was 8.8% in the treatment from early pregnancy group and 10% in the treatment from mid-pregnancy group, with no significant difference, whereas small for gestational age (SGA) was significantly higher in the treatment from early pregnancy group (9.4%) than in the treatment from mid-pregnancy group (4.8%) (p=0.046). There were no significant differences in maternal adverse events and neonatal outcomes between the groups. In a subanalysis limited to body mass index >25 kg/m

conclusionsThe strategy for diagnosing GDM by IADPSG thresholds in early pregnancy and providing treatment to all patients from early pregnancy did not improve the pregnancy outcomes, but rather increased the SGA rate.

Indexed as

Diabetes, GestationalPregnancy in DiabeticsFemaleGlucose Tolerance TestHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeRetrospective StudiesWeight GainGestational Diabetes MellitusPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID37270179
PMCPMC10254954
OpenAlexW4379259933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.