Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37269674›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in chemical biology2023

Rejuvenating old fluorophores with new chemistry.

Martin J Schnermann, Luke D Lavis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in chemical biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Trinuclear Heptamethine Dyes for Shortwave Infrared In Vivo Imaging.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. On-Target Photoassembly of Pyronin Dyes for Super-Resolution Microscopy.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Mechanistic Insight into the Thermal "Blueing" of Cyanine Dyes.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Optimized Red-Absorbing Dyes for Imaging and Sensing.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Martin J SchnermannChemical Biology Laboratory, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Building 376, Frederick, MD 20850, USA. Electronic address: martin.schnermann@nih.gov.
Luke D LavisJanelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, 19700 Helix Drive, Ashburn, VA, 20147, USA. Electronic address: lavisl@janelia.hhmi.org.

Funding

Synthesis and evaluation of small-molecule imaging agentsZIABC011506 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI SCHNERMANN, MARTIN · 2013 to 2025
$12.1M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteIntramural NIH HHS ZIA BC011506
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The field of organic chemistry began with 19th century scientists identifying and then expanding upon synthetic dye molecules for textiles. In the 20th century, dye chemistry continued with the aim of developing photographic sensitizers and laser dyes. Now, in the 21st century, the rapid evolution of biological imaging techniques provides a new driving force for dye chemistry. Of the extant collection of synthetic fluorescent dyes for biological imaging, two classes reign supreme: rhodamines and cyanines. Here, we provide an overview of recent examples where modern chemistry is used to build these old-but-venerable classes of optically responsive molecules. These new synthetic methods access new fluorophores, which then enable sophisticated imaging experiments leading to new biological insights.

Indexed as

Fluorescent DyesLightRhodaminesFluorescent DyesRhodaminesCyanineFluorescenceImagingMicroscopyOrganic chemistryRhodamine

Identifiers

PMID37269674
PMCPMC10524207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.