Observational studyJournal of robotic surgery2023
Exploring the use of driving simulation to improve robotic surgery simulator training: an observational case-control study.
Observational study in Journal of robotic surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The correlation between driving skills and the ability to perform robotic surgery have not yet been discussed. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the impact of driving skills on learning robotic surgery using a driving simulator and a robotic simulator. Sixty robot- and simulator-naïve participants were recruited: 30 with a driver's license and 30 without a driver's license. All participants completed a test on the driving simulator and learned four tasks using a robotic surgical simulator (dV-Trainer). On the driving simulator, the lap time in the driver's license group (D-Group) was significantly lower than that in the non-driver's license group (ND-Group) [217.93 ± 42.79 s vs. 271.24 ± 46.63 s, P < 0.001]. The average number of tires off track in the D-Group was lower than that in the ND-Group (0.13 ± 0.35 vs. 0.57 ± 0.63, P = 0.002). The baseline score of the D-Group on the robotic simulator was higher than that of the ND-Group (467.53 ± 107.62 vs. 385.53 ± 136.30, P = 0.022). In the Pick-and-Place-Clutching, Peg-Board-2, and Thread-the-Rings-1 tasks, the learning curve of the D-Group was steeper than that of the ND-Group. However, no significant difference was observed in the Match-Board-2 task. According to the lap time ranking, participants in the top tertile had a steeper learning curve than those in the bottom tertile, especially for the Pick-and-Place-Clutching and Peg-Board-2 tasks (P < 0.05). Significant differences were also found in the baseline and final stages of the Thread-the-Rings-1 task and in the initial stage of the Match-Board-2 task (P < 0.05). Students with a driver's license or better performance in racing games had more success in learning robotic surgery. Driving simulators may promote robotic surgery training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.