Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37269443›Full record

Observational studyInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2023

Evaluating the potential outcomes of pharmacist-led activities in the Australian general practice setting: a prospective observational study.

Thilini Sudeshika, Louise S Deeks, Mark Naunton, Gregory M Peterson, Sam Kosari

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The role of community pharmacists in cancer survivorship care - a scoping review.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Pharmacists in general practice: what do they do? A qualitative case study.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Thilini SudeshikaDiscipline of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Bruce, ACT, 2617, Australia. thilini.salpahewage@canberra.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5500-0353
Louise S DeeksDiscipline of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Bruce, ACT, 2617, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8043-9528
Mark NauntonDiscipline of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Bruce, ACT, 2617, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6422-7170
Gregory M PetersonDiscipline of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Bruce, ACT, 2617, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6764-3882
Sam KosariDiscipline of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Bruce, ACT, 2617, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6737-1442

Funding

Capital Health Network (CHN): Australian Capital Territory's primary health network 25097479
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPharmacists have been co-located in general practice teams to support the quality use of medicines and optimise patient health outcomes. Evidence of the impact of pharmacist-led activities in Australian general practices is sparse.

aimThis study aimed to evaluate the potential outcomes of pharmacist-led activities in Australian general practices.

methodA prospective observational study was conducted in eight general practices in the Australian Capital Territory, where each general practice employed a pharmacist on a part-time basis for 18 months. A recommended, but flexible, list of activities was provided for pharmacists. Descriptive information on general practice pharmacist-led activities, collected with an online diary, was analysed. The potential clinical, economic, and organisational impact of pharmacist-led clinical activities was evaluated using the CLinical Economic Organisational (CLEO) tool, with a modified economic dimension.

resultsNine pharmacists reported 4290 activities over 3918.5 work hours in general practice. Medication management services were the primary clinical activity of pharmacists. In medication reviews, 75% of the pharmacists' recommendations were fully accepted by general practitioners. Conducting clinical audits, updating patients' medical records, and providing information to patients and staff were other major activities of pharmacists. Of 2419 clinical activities, around 50% had the potential for a moderate or major positive clinical impact on patients. Sixty-three per cent of activities had the potential to decrease healthcare costs. Almost all the pharmacist-led clinical activities had a positive organisational impact.

conclusionMost pharmacist-led clinical activities in general practice had the potential for a positive impact on patients and reduction in healthcare costs, supporting the expansion of this model in Australia.

Indexed as

General PracticeGeneral PractitionersAustraliaHealth Care CostsHumansPharmacistsClinical activitiesClinical impactEconomic impactEvaluationGeneral practice pharmacistMedicinesOrganisational impact

Identifiers

PMID37269443
PMCPMC10239215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.