ReviewJournal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia2023
Molecular Characterization and Landscape of Breast cancer Models from a multi-omics Perspective.
Review in Journal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Three-dimensional spheroid models in breast cancer: tumor microenvironment complexity, cancer stem cell-driven resistance, and translational model integration.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Bridging In Vitro and Murine Breast Cancer Models: Advanced Imaging Across Multiscale Experimental Platforms.Cancers · 2026Review
- A Novel Patient-Derived Xenograft Model of Inflammatory Breast Cancer.Research square · 2026Article
- Regulatory Variants in the KRAS 3'UTR and Intron 2 Are Associated with Breast Cancer Susceptibility Through Independent and Combinatorial Effects in a Mexican Population.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- From Phytochemical Characterization to Energy Metabolism-Driven Molecular Responses: The Anticancer Potential ofNutrients · 2026Article
- Krüppel-like factor 10 promotes the progression of breast cancer by activating canonical NF-κB signaling.iScience · 2026Article
- NOHA as a key biomarker to link NOS2 activity to immune checkpoint and cytokine signaling in ER-negative breast cancer.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2026Article
- ERFrontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Review
- Murine Models of Obesity-Related Cancer Risk.Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2025Review
- Targeting the MAPK signaling pathway: implications and prospects of flavonoids in 3P medicine as modulators of cancer cell plasticity and therapeutic resistance in breast cancer patients.The EPMA journal · 2025Article
- CXCR4Nature communications · 2025Article
- Genomic Landscape of Breast Cancer: Study Across Diverse Ethnic Groups.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Molecular Basis of Breast Tumor Heterogeneity.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025Review
- Article
- A New Perspective on Precision Medicine: The Power of Digital Organoids.Biomaterials research · 2025Review
- Patient-derived response estimates from zero-passage organoids of luminal breast cancer.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2024Article
- A gap analysis of UK biobank publications reveals SNPs associated with intrinsic subtypes of breast cancer.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Article
- Deep learning applications in breast cancer histopathological imaging: diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer is well-known to be a highly heterogenous disease. This facet of cancer makes finding a research model that mirrors the disparate intrinsic features challenging. With advances in multi-omics technologies, establishing parallels between the various models and human tumors is increasingly intricate. Here we review the various model systems and their relation to primary breast tumors using available omics data platforms. Among the research models reviewed here, breast cancer cell lines have the least resemblance to human tumors since they have accumulated many mutations and copy number alterations during their long use. Moreover, individual proteomic and metabolomic profiles do not overlap with the molecular landscape of breast cancer. Interestingly, omics analysis revealed that the initial subtype classification of some breast cancer cell lines was inappropriate. In cell lines the major subtypes are all well represented and share some features with primary tumors. In contrast, patient-derived xenografts (PDX) and patient-derived organoids (PDO) are superior in mirroring human breast cancers at many levels, making them suitable models for drug screening and molecular analysis. While patient derived organoids are spread across luminal, basal- and normal-like subtypes, the PDX samples were initially largely basal but other subtypes have been increasingly described. Murine models offer heterogenous tumor landscapes, inter and intra-model heterogeneity, and give rise to tumors of different phenotypes and histology. Murine models have a reduced mutational burden compared to human breast cancer but share some transcriptomic resemblance, and representation of many breast cancer subtypes can be found among the variety subtypes. To date, while mammospheres and three- dimensional cultures lack comprehensive omics data, these are excellent models for the study of stem cells, cell fate decision and differentiation, and have also been used for drug screening. Therefore, this review explores the molecular landscapes and characterization of breast cancer research models by comparing recent published multi-omics data and analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.