Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37269339›Full record

ArticleClinical oral investigations2023

Determining primary stability for adhesively stabilized dental implants.

Ole Zoffmann Andersen, Benjamin Bellón, Maryam Lamkaouchi, Marzia Brunelli, Qiuju Wei, Philip Procter, Benjamin E Pippenger

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Advances in Periodontal Therapy: A Comprehensive Review ofCurrent drug discovery technologies · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Ole Zoffmann AndersenDepartment of Periodontology, University of Bern, Frieburgstrasse 7, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.
Benjamin BellónInstitut Straumann AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Maryam LamkaouchiUniversity of Bordeaux, INSERM BIOTIS, U1026, Bordeaux, France.
Marzia BrunelliInstitut Straumann AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Qiuju WeiDepartment of Periodontology, University of Bern, Frieburgstrasse 7, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.
Philip ProcterDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Applied Materials Science University of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden.
Benjamin E PippengerDepartment of Periodontology, University of Bern, Frieburgstrasse 7, 3010, Bern, Switzerland. benjamin.pippenger@unibe.ch.
Bern University of Applied Sciences · CHStraumann (Switzerland) · CHInserm · FRTampere University · FIUppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo examine factors influencing the primary stability of dental implants when stabilized in over-sized osteotomies using a calcium phosphate-based adhesive cement was the objective.

methodsUsing implant removal torque measurements as a surrogate for primary stability, we examined the influence of implant design features (diameter, surface area, and thread design), along with cement gap size and curing time, on the resulting primary implant stability.

resultsRemoval torque values scaled with implant surface area and increasing implant diameters. Cement gap size did not alter the median removal torque values; however, larger gaps were associated with an increased spread of the measured values. Among the removal torque values measured, all were found to be above 32 Ncm which is an insertion torque threshold value commonly recommended for immediate loading protocols.

conclusionThe adhesive cement show potential for offering primary implant stability for different dental implant designs. In this study, the primary parameters influencing the measured removal torque values were the implant surface area and diameter. As the liquid cement prevents the use of insertion torque, considering the relationship between insertion and removal torque, removal torque can be considered a reliable surrogate for primary implant stability for bench and pre-clinical settings. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: At present, the primary stability of dental implants is linked to the quality of the host bone, the drill protocol, and the specific implant design. The adhesive cement might find applications in future clinical settings for enhancing primary stability of implants under circumstances where this cannot be achieved conventionally.

Indexed as

Dental ImplantsBone and BonesDental Implantation, EndosseousDental Prosthesis DesignDevice RemovalTorqueDental ImplantsBioadhesiveDental implantIn vitroPrimary stabilityRemoval torque

Identifiers

PMID37269339
PMCPMC10329622
OpenAlexW4379207427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.