Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37269304›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2023

Plain X-ray is insufficient for correct diagnosis of tibial shaft spiral fractures: a prospective trial.

Leonard Lisitano, Timon Röttinger, Andreas Wiedl, Kim Rau, Sönke Helling, Jairo Cifuentes, Bertram Jehs, Mark Härting, Laura-Marie Feitelson, Johannes Gleich and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Editorial-Focus on tibia shaft fractures.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Leonard LisitanoDepartment for Trauma, Orthopedics, Hand and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156, Augsburg, Germany. leonard.lisitano@uk-augsburg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2194-4487
Timon RöttingerDepartment for Trauma, Orthopedics, Hand and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156, Augsburg, Germany.
Andreas WiedlDepartment for Trauma, Orthopedics, Hand and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156, Augsburg, Germany.
Kim RauDepartment for Trauma, Orthopedics, Hand and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156, Augsburg, Germany.
Sönke HellingDepartment for Trauma, Orthopedics, Hand and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156, Augsburg, Germany.
Jairo CifuentesDepartment for Trauma, Orthopedics, Hand and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156, Augsburg, Germany.
Bertram JehsDepartment for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Mark HärtingDepartment for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Laura-Marie FeitelsonDepartment for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Johannes GleichDepartment for Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Musculoskeletal University Center Munich (MUM), University Hospital LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Sophia KieslDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Daniel PfeuferDepartment for Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Musculoskeletal University Center Munich (MUM), University Hospital LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Carl NeuerburgDepartment for Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Musculoskeletal University Center Munich (MUM), University Hospital LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Edgar MayrDepartment for Trauma, Orthopedics, Hand and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156, Augsburg, Germany.
Stefan FörchDepartment for Trauma, Orthopedics, Hand and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156, Augsburg, Germany.
University Hospital Augsburg · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DELMU Klinikum · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTibial shaft spiral fractures and fractures of the distal third of the tibia (AO:42A/B/C and 43A) frequently occur with non-displaced posterior malleolus fractures (PM). This study investigated the hypothesis that plain X-ray is not sufficient for a reliable diagnosis of associated non-displaced PM fractures in tibial shaft spiral fractures.

methods50 X-rays showing 42A/B/C and 43A fractures were evaluated by two groups of physicians, each group was comprised of a resident and a fellowship-trained traumatologist or radiologist. Each group was tasked to make a diagnosis and/or suggest if further imaging was needed. One group was primed with the incidence of PM fractures and asked to explicitly assess the PM.

resultsOverall, 9.13/25 (SD ± 5.77) PM fractures were diagnosed on X-ray. If the posterior malleolus fracture was named or a CT was requested, the fracture was considered "detected". With this in mind, 14.8 ± 5.95 posterior malleolus fractures were detected. Significantly more fractures were diagnosed/detected (14 vs. 4.25/25; p < 0.001/14.8 vs. 10.5/25; p < 0.001) in the group with awareness. However, there were significantly more false positives in the awareness group (2.5 vs. 0.5; p = 0.024). Senior physicians recognized slightly more fractures than residents (residents: 13.0 ± 7.79; senior physicians: 16.5 ± 3.70; p = 0.040). No significant differences were demonstrated between radiologists and trauma surgeons. The inner-rater reliability was high with 91.2% agreement. Inter-rater reliability showed fair agreement (Fleiss-Kappa 0.274, p < 0.001) across all examiners and moderate agreement (Fleiss-Kappa 0.561, p < 0.001) in group 2.

conclusionOnly 17% of PM fractures were identified on plain X-ray and awareness of PM only improved diagnosis by 39%. While experiencing improved accuracy, CT imaging should be included in a comprehensive examination of tibial shaft spiral fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II. Diagnostic prospective cohort study. TRAIL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00030075.

Indexed as

Ankle FracturesTibial FracturesHumansProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsTibiaTomography, X-Ray ComputedX-RaysAnkle fracturesDelayed diagnosisDiagnostic errorsTibia fractures

Identifiers

PMID37269304
PMCPMC10728229
OpenAlexW4379207300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.