Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37269062›Full record

ArticleClinical trials (London, England)2023

The improving Medication Adherence in Adolescents and young adults following Liver Transplantation (iMALT) multisite trial: Design and trial implementation considerations.

Eyal Shemesh, Sarah Duncan-Park, George Mazariegos, Rachel Annunziato, Ravinder Anand, Miguel Reyes-Mugica, Jeff Mitchell, Benjamin L Shneider, for iMALT

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical trials (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A remote intervention to improve medication nonadherence guided by a marker of risk derived from the electronic health records of adolescent transplant recipients.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2026
    Trial
  2. Role of social determinants and outcomes of patients with alcohol-associated liver disease referred for early liver transplantation: A multicenter analysis.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Eyal ShemeshIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2508-3423
Sarah Duncan-ParkIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
George MazariegosUPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Rachel AnnunziatoIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Ravinder AnandThe Emmes Company LLC, Rockville, MD, USA.
Miguel Reyes-MugicaUPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Jeff MitchellThe Emmes Company LLC, Rockville, MD, USA.
Benjamin L ShneiderBaylor College of Medicine and Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.
for iMALT
Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh · USEmmes (United States) · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USBaylor College of Medicine · USFordham University · US

Funding

Improving Medication Adherence in adolescents who had a Liver Transplant: iMALTU01DK119200 · NIDDK · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI SHEMESH, EYAL · 2018 to 2023
$5.8M
Medication Adherence in Children Who Had a Liver Transplant (MALT)R01DK080740 · NIDDK · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI SHEMESH, EYAL · 2009 to 2014
$3.3M
Improving Medication Adherence in children who had a Liver Transplant: iMALTU34DK112661 · NIDDK · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI SHEMESH, EYAL · 2016 to 2017
$643k
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK080740NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK119200NIDDK NIH HHS U34 DK112661
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimsMedication non-adherence is a leading cause of transplant rejection, organ loss, and death; yet no rigorous controlled study to date has shown compelling clinical benefits from an adherence-improving intervention. Non-adherent patients are less likely to participate in trials, and therefore, most studies enroll a majority of adherent patients who do not stand to benefit from the intervention, as they do not have the condition (non-adherence) under investigation. The improving Medication Adherence in adolescent Liver Transplant recipients trial specifically targets non-adherent patients to investigate whether a remote intervention to improve adherence results in reduced incidence of biopsy-confirmed rejection.

methodsImproving Medication Adherence in adolescent Liver Transplant is a randomized single-blind controlled multisite, multinational National Institutes of Health-funded trial involving 13 pediatric transplant centers in the United States and Canada. An innovative, objective adherence biomarker-the Medication Level Variability Index, which is the standard deviation of a series of medication blood levels for each patient, is used to identify non-adherent patients at risk for rejection. The index is computed using electronic health record information for all potentially eligible patients based on repeated reviews of the entire clinic's roster. Identified patients, after consent, are randomized to intervention versus control (treatment as usual) arms. The remote intervention is delivered for 2 years by trained interventionists who reside in various locations in the United States. The primary outcome is the incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute cellular rejection, as confirmed by a majority vote of three pathologists who are masked to the study allocation and clinical information. DISCUSSION: Improving Medication Adherence in adolescent Liver Transplant includes several innovative design elements. The use of a validated, objective adherence index to survey a large cohort of transplant recipients allows the teams to avoid bias inherent in both convenience sampling and referral-based recruitment and enroll only patients whose computed index indicates substantially increased risk of rejection. The remote intervention paradigm helps to engage patients who are by definition hard to engage. The use of an objective, masked medical (rather than behavioral) outcome measure reduces the likelihood of biases related to clinical information and ensures broad acceptance by the field. Finally, monitoring for potential adverse events related to increased medication exposure due to the adherence intervention acknowledges that a successful intervention (increasing adherence) could have detrimental side effects via increased exposure to and potential toxicity of the medication. Such monitoring is almost never attempted in clinical trials evaluating adherence interventions.

Indexed as

Liver TransplantationAdolescentHumansMedication AdherenceMulticenter Studies as TopicOutcome Assessment, Health CareRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSingle-Blind MethodSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesYoung AdultbiomarkerPediatric transplantrandomized clinical trialtelemetric intervention

Identifiers

PMID37269062
PMCPMC10524899
OpenAlexW4379197331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.