Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37269009›Full record

ArticleMilitary Medical Research2023

Prediction of treatment response to antipsychotic drugs for precision medicine approach to schizophrenia: randomized trials and multiomics analysis.

Liang-Kun Guo, Yi Su, Yu-Ya-Nan Zhang, Hao Yu, Zhe Lu, Wen-Qiang Li, Yong-Feng Yang, Xiao Xiao, Hao Yan, Tian-Lan Lu and 17 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Military Medical Research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Schizophrenia: from mechanism to therapy.Science China. Life sciences · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors at 10 institutions in 4 countries.

Liang-Kun GuoInstitute of Mental Health, Peking University Sixth Hospital, Beijing, 100191, China.
Yi SuPeking University Huilongguan Clinical Medical School, Beijing Huilongguan Hospital, Beijing, 100096, China.
Yu-Ya-Nan ZhangInstitute of Mental Health, Peking University Sixth Hospital, Beijing, 100191, China.
Hao YuDepartment of Psychiatry, Jining Medical University, Jining, 272067, Shandong, China.
Zhe LuInstitute of Mental Health, Peking University Sixth Hospital, Beijing, 100191, China.
Wen-Qiang LiHenan Key Lab of Biological Psychiatry, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang, 435001, Henan, China.
Yong-Feng YangHenan Key Lab of Biological Psychiatry, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang, 435001, Henan, China.
Xiao XiaoKey Laboratory of Animal Models and Human Disease Mechanisms of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and Yunnan Province, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650223, China.
Hao YanInstitute of Mental Health, Peking University Sixth Hospital, Beijing, 100191, China.
Tian-Lan LuInstitute of Mental Health, Peking University Sixth Hospital, Beijing, 100191, China.
Jun LiInstitute of Mental Health, Peking University Sixth Hospital, Beijing, 100191, China.
Yun-Dan LiaoInstitute of Mental Health, Peking University Sixth Hospital, Beijing, 100191, China.
Zhe-Wei KangInstitute of Mental Health, Peking University Sixth Hospital, Beijing, 100191, China.
Li-Fang WangInstitute of Mental Health, Peking University Sixth Hospital, Beijing, 100191, China.
Yue LiInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, WC2R 2LS, UK.
Ming LiKey Laboratory of Animal Models and Human Disease Mechanisms of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and Yunnan Province, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650223, China.
Bing LiuState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China.
Hai-Liang HuangAnalytic and Translational Genetics Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Lu-Xian LvHenan Key Lab of Biological Psychiatry, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang, 435001, Henan, China.
Yin YaoDepartment of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200438, China.
Yun-Long TanPeking University Huilongguan Clinical Medical School, Beijing Huilongguan Hospital, Beijing, 100096, China.
Gerome BreenInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, WC2R 2LS, UK.
Ian EverallInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, WC2R 2LS, UK.
Hong-Xing WangDepartment of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100053, China.
Zhuo HuangState Key Laboratory of Natural and Biomimetic Drugs, Key Laboratory for Neuroscience for Ministry of Education, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, 100191, China. huangz@hsc.pku.edu.cn.
Dai ZhangInstitute of Mental Health, Peking University Sixth Hospital, Beijing, 100191, China. daizhang@bjmu.edu.cn.
Wei-Hua YueInstitute of Mental Health, Peking University Sixth Hospital, Beijing, 100191, China. dryue@bjmu.edu.cn.
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNHenan Psychiatric Hospital · CNKing's College London · GBPeking University · CNKunming Institute of Zoology · CNBeijing Normal University · CNBroad Institute · USCapital Medical University · CNFudan University · CNJining Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChoosing the appropriate antipsychotic drug (APD) treatment for patients with schizophrenia (SCZ) can be challenging, as the treatment response to APD is highly variable and difficult to predict due to the lack of effective biomarkers. Previous studies have indicated the association between treatment response and genetic and epigenetic factors, but no effective biomarkers have been identified. Hence, further research is imperative to enhance precision medicine in SCZ treatment.

methodsParticipants with SCZ were recruited from two randomized trials. The discovery cohort was recruited from the CAPOC trial (n = 2307) involved 6 weeks of treatment and equally randomized the participants to the Olanzapine, Risperidone, Quetiapine, Aripiprazole, Ziprasidone, and Haloperidol/Perphenazine (subsequently equally assigned to one or the other) groups. The external validation cohort was recruited from the CAPEC trial (n = 1379), which involved 8 weeks of treatment and equally randomized the participants to the Olanzapine, Risperidone, and Aripiprazole groups. Additionally, healthy controls (n = 275) from the local community were utilized as a genetic/epigenetic reference. The genetic and epigenetic (DNA methylation) risks of SCZ were assessed using the polygenic risk score (PRS) and polymethylation score, respectively. The study also examined the genetic-epigenetic interactions with treatment response through differential methylation analysis, methylation quantitative trait loci, colocalization, and promoter-anchored chromatin interaction. Machine learning was used to develop a prediction model for treatment response, which was evaluated for accuracy and clinical benefit using the area under curve (AUC) for classification, R

resultsSix risk genes for SCZ (LINC01795, DDHD2, SBNO1, KCNG2, SEMA7A, and RUFY1) involved in cortical morphology were identified as having a genetic-epigenetic interaction associated with treatment response. The developed and externally validated prediction model, which incorporated clinical information, PRS, genetic risk score (GRS), and proxy methylation level (proxyDNAm), demonstrated positive benefits for a wide range of patients receiving different APDs, regardless of sex [discovery cohort: AUC = 0.874 (95% CI 0.867-0.881), R

conclusionsThis study presents a promising precision medicine approach to evaluate treatment response, which has the potential to aid clinicians in making informed decisions about APD treatment for patients with SCZ. Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ( https://www.chictr.org.cn/ ), 18. Aug 2009 retrospectively registered: CAPOC-ChiCTR-RNC-09000521 ( https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=9014 ), CAPEC-ChiCTR-RNC-09000522 ( https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=9013 ).

Indexed as

Antipsychotic AgentsSchizophreniaAripiprazoleBenzodiazepinesHumansMultiomicsOlanzapinePhospholipasesPrecision MedicineRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRisperidoneAntipsychotic AgentsAripiprazoleBenzodiazepinesDDHD2 protein, humanOlanzapinePhospholipasesRisperidoneAntipsychotic drugEpigeneticsGeneticsPrediction modelSchizophreniaTreatment response

Identifiers

PMID37269009
PMCPMC10236828
OpenAlexW4379197098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.