Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37268966›Full record

ArticleArchives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique2023

Successes, weaknesses, and recommendations to strengthen primary health care: a scoping review.

Aklilu Endalamaw, Daniel Erku, Resham B Khatri, Frehiwot Nigatu, Eskinder Wolka, Anteneh Zewdie, Yibeltal Assefa

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Primary health care strengthening through the lens of healthcare system thinking.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Reorienting health systems towards Primary Health Care in South Asia.The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Aklilu EndalamawSchool of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. yaklilu12@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9121-6549
Daniel ErkuSchool of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8878-0317
Resham B KhatriSchool of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5216-606X
Frehiwot NigatuInternational Institute for Primary Health Care in Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Eskinder WolkaInternational Institute for Primary Health Care in Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Anteneh ZewdieInternational Institute for Primary Health Care in Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Yibeltal AssefaSchool of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2393-1492

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrimary health care (PHC) is a roadmap for achieving universal health coverage (UHC). There were several fragmented and inconclusive pieces of evidence needed to be synthesized. Hence, we synthesized evidence to fully understand the successes, weaknesses, effective strategies, and barriers of PHC.

methodsWe followed the PRISMA extension for scoping reviews checklist. Qualitative, quantitative, or mixed-approach studies were included. The result synthesis is in a realistic approach with identifying which strategies and challenges existed at which country, in what context and why it happens.

resultsA total of 10,556 articles were found. Of these, 134 articles were included for the final synthesis. Most studies (86 articles) were quantitative followed by qualitative (26 articles), and others (16 review and 6 mixed methods). Countries sought varying degrees of success and weakness. Strengths of PHC include less costly community health workers services, increased health care coverage and improved health outcomes. Declined continuity of care, less comprehensive in specialized care settings and ineffective reform were weaknesses in some countries. There were effective strategies: leadership, financial system, 'Diagonal investment', adequate health workforce, expanding PHC institutions, after-hour services, telephone appointment, contracting with non-governmental partners, a 'Scheduling Model', a strong referral system and measurement tools. On the other hand, high health care cost, client's bad perception of health care, inadequate health workers, language problem and lack of quality of circle were barriers.

conclusionsThere was heterogeneous progress towards PHC vision. A country with a higher UHC effective service coverage index does not reflect its effectiveness in all aspects of PHC. Continuing monitoring and evaluation of PHC system, subsidies to the poor, and training and recruiting an adequate health workforce will keep PHC progress on track. The results of this review can be used as a guide for future research in selecting exploratory and outcome parameters.

Indexed as

BarriersPrimary carePrimary health careScoping ReviewStrategiesSuccessesWeaknesses

Identifiers

PMID37268966
PMCPMC10236853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.