Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37268965›Full record

ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2023

Barriers and facilitating factors of care coordination for children with spinal muscular atrophy type I and II from the caregivers' perspective: an interview study.

Jana Willems, Isabella Bablok, Erik Farin-Glattacker, Thorsten Langer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jana WillemsSection of Health Care Research and Rehabilitation Research, Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Straße 49, 79106, Freiburg, Germany. jana.willems@uniklinik-freiburg.de.ORCID 0000-0003-2911-8486
Isabella BablokSection of Health Care Research and Rehabilitation Research, Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Straße 49, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Erik Farin-Glattacker *Section of Health Care Research and Rehabilitation Research, Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Straße 49, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Thorsten Langer *Department of Neuropediatrics and Muscle Disorders, Center for Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChildren with medical complexity (CMC) require long-term care accompanied by different health- and social care professionals. Depending on the severity of the chronic condition, caregivers spend a lot of time coordinating appointments, communicating between providers, clarifying social legal issues, and more. Effective care coordination is seen as key to addressing the fragmented care that CMC and their families often face. Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a rare genetic, neuromuscular disease which care involves drug therapy and supportive treatment. We examined the care coordination experiences through a qualitative interview analysis of n = 21 interviews with caregivers of children with SMA I or SMA II.

resultsThe code system consists of 7 codes and 12 sub-codes. "Disease and coordination management of the caregivers" describes the management of coordination-related illness demands. "General conditions of care" include enduring organizational aspects of the care network. "Expertise and skills" refers to both parent and professional expertise. "Coordination structure" describes the assessment of existing coordination mechanisms as well as the need for new ones. "Information exchange" defines the information exchange between professionals and parents as well as the exchange of parents among themselves and the perceived exchange between professionals. "Role distribution in care coordination" summarizes parents' "distribution" of coordinative roles among care network actors (including their own). "Quality of relationship" describes the perceived quality of the relationship between professionals and family.

conclusionCare coordination is influenced peripherally (e.g., by general conditions of care) and directly (e.g., by coordination mechanisms, interaction in the care network). Access to care coordination appears to be dependent on family circumstances, geographic location, and institutional affiliation. Previous coordination mechanisms were often unstructured and informal. Care coordination is frequently in the hands of caregivers mainly as the care network's interface. Coordination is necessary and must be addressed on an individual basis of existing resources and family barriers. Existing coordination mechanisms in the context of other chronic conditions could also work for SMA. Regular assessments, centralized shared care pathways, and staff training and empowerment of families for self-management should be central components of all coordination models.

trial registrationGerman Clinical Trials Register (DRKS): DRKS00018778; Trial registration date 05. December 2019-Retrospectively registered; https://apps.who.int/trialsearch/Trial2.aspx?TrialID=DRKS00018778 .

Indexed as

Muscular Atrophy, SpinalSpinal Muscular Atrophies of ChildhoodCaregiversChildHumansParentsQualitative ResearchCare coordinationChildren with medical complexityRare diseasesSemi-structured interviewsSpinal muscular atrophy

Identifiers

PMID37268965
PMCPMC10239104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.