Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37268896›Full record

Observational studyBMC musculoskeletal disorders2023

The Korean hip fracture registry study.

Jung-Wee Park, Yong-Chan Ha, Jin-Woo Kim, Tae-Young Kim, Ji Wan Kim, Seung-Hoon Baek, Young-Kyun Lee, Kyung-Hoi Koo

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Jung-Wee Park *Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea.
Yong-Chan Ha *Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul Bumin Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Jin-Woo KimDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nowon Eulji Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea.
Tae-Young KimDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Ji Wan KimDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Seung-Hoon BaekDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, South Korea.
Young-Kyun LeeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea. ykleemd@gmail.com.
Kyung-Hoi KooDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea.
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital · KRAsan Medical Center · KRBumin Hospital Group · KRKonkuk University · KRKyungpook National University Hospital · KRUlsan College · KR

Funding

Korea Health Industry Development Institute,South Korea HC15C1189
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe purpose of the Korean Hip Fracture Registry (KHFR) Study is to establish a nationwide, hospital-based prospective cohort study of adults with hip fracture to explore the incidence and risk factors of second osteoporotic fractures for a Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) model.

methodsThe KHFR, a prospective multicenter longitudinal study, was launched in 2014. Sixteen centers recruited participants who were treated for hip fracture. The inclusion criteria were patients, who were treated for proximal femur fracture due to low-energy trauma and aged 50 or more at the time of injury. Until 2018, 5,841 patients were enrolled in this study. Follow-up surveys were conducted annually to determine occurrence of second osteoporotic fracture, and 4,803 participants completed at least one follow-up survey. DISCUSSION: KHFR is a unique resource of individual level on osteoporotic hip fracture with radiological, medical, and laboratory information including DXA (dual energy x-ray absorptiometry), bone turnover marker, body composition, and hand grip strength for future analyses for FLS model. Modifiable factors for mortality after hip surgery is planned to be identified with nutritional assessment and multi-disciplinary interventions from hospitalization to follow-ups. The proportions of femoral neck, intertrochanteric, and subtrochanteric fractures were 517 (42.0%), 730 (53.6%), and 60 (4.4%), respectively, from 2014 to 2016, which was similar in other studies. Radiologic definition of atypical subtrochanteric fracture was adopted and 17 (1.2%) fractures among 1,361 proximal femoral fractures were identified. Internal fixation showed higher reoperation rate compared to arthroplasty in unstable intertrochanteric fractures (6.1% vs. 2.4%, p = 0.046) with no significant difference in mortality. The KHFR plans to identify outcomes and risk factors associated with second fracture by conducting a 10-year cohort study, with a follow-up every year, using 5,841 baseline participants.

trial registrationPresent study was registered on Internet-based Clinical Research and Trial management system (iCReaT) as multicenter prospective observational cohort study (Project number: C160022, Date of registration: 22th, Apr, 2016).

Indexed as

Hip FracturesOsteoporotic FracturesAdultCohort StudiesHand StrengthHumansLongitudinal StudiesProspective StudiesRegistriesRepublic of KoreaFracture liaison serviceHip fractureOsteoporotic fractureRegistry studySecond fracture

Identifiers

PMID37268896
PMCPMC10236602
OpenAlexW4379197310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.