ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2023
Type 2 diabetes mellitus plays a protective role against osteoporosis --mendelian randomization analysis.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mendelian randomization studies of risk and protective factors for osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Pooled it
- The effect of type 2 diabetes genetic predisposition on non-cardiovascular comorbidities.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Systematic druggable genome-wide Mendelian randomization identifies therapeutic targets for osteoporosis.Osteoporosis and sarcopenia · 2025Article
- The effect of type 2 diabetes genetic predisposition on non-cardiovascular comorbidities.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Causal association of allergic diseases, eosinophils, and osteoporosis: A Mendelian randomization study.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2025Article
- Causal Relationships Between Abdominal Obesity, Type 2 Diabetes, Fasting Insulin, and Cervical Disc Disorders, Osteoporosis, and Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Mendelian Randomization Study.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Article
- Correlation between bone mineral density and type 2 diabetes mellitus in elderly men and postmenopausal women.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Diabetes and osteoporosis: a two-sample mendelian randomization study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2024Article
- A Mendelian randomization study of the association between serum uric acid and osteoporosis risk.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Article
- Effects of FGF21 overexpression in osteoporosis and bone mineral density: a two-sample, mediating Mendelian analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundType 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) and osteoporosis (OP) are currently the two most significant causes of mortality and morbidity in older adults, according to clinical evidence. The intrinsic link between them is yet unknown, despite reports of their coexistence. By utilizing the two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) approach, we sought to evaluate the causal impact of DM2 on OP.
methodsThe aggregate data of the whole gene-wide association study (GWAS) were analyzed. A two-sample MR analysis was performed using single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), which are strongly associated with DM2, as instrumental variables (IVs) to evaluate the causal analysis of DM2 on OP risk with OR values, using inverse variance weighting, MR-egger regression, and weighted median methods, respectively.
resultA total of 38 single nucleotide polymorphisms were included as tool variables. According to the results of inverse variance-weighted (IVW), we found that there was a causal relationship between DM2 and OP, in which DM2 had a protective effect on OP. For each additional case of DM2, there is a 0.15% decrease in the odds of developing OP (OR = 0.9985;95%confidence interval:0.9974,0.9995; P value = 0.0056). There was no evidence that the observed causal effect between DM2 and the risk of OP was affected by genetic pleiotropy (P = 0.299). Using Cochran Q statistics and MR-Egger regression in the IVW approach, the heterogeneity was calculated; P > 0.05 shows that there is a significant amount of heterogeneity.
conclusionA causal link between DM2 and OP was established by MR analysis, which also revealed that DM2 decreased the occurrence of OP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.