ReviewNature protocols2023
Genetic recording of in vivo cell proliferation by ProTracer.
Review in Nature protocols, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Use of Single-Cell Mitochondrial DNA SNP Combinations for Distinguishing Organ-Specific Cell Types.Cells · 2026Article
- Glucocorticoids and cell fate in the developing brain: Neuroendocrine mechanisms shaping developmental trajectories.Journal of neuroendocrinology · 2026Review
- Insights into Cardiomyocyte Regeneration from Screening and Transcriptomics Approaches.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- FGF7 promotes load-bearing tendon regeneration and suppresses fibrosis.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Molecular mechanisms in liver repair and regeneration: from physiology to therapeutics.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2025Review
- Reconstructing Progenitor State Hierarchy and Dynamics Using Lineage Barcoding Data.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The ability to experimentally measure cell proliferation is the basis for understanding the sources of cells that drive organ development, tissue regeneration and repair. Recently, we generated a genetic approach to detect cell proliferation: we used genetic lineage-tracing technologies to achieve seamless recording of in vivo cell proliferation in a tissue-specific manner. We provide a detailed protocol (generation of mouse lines, characterization of mouse lines, mouse line crossing and cell-proliferation tracing) for using this genetic system to study cell proliferation. This cell-proliferation tracing system, which we term 'ProTracer' (Proliferation Tracer), permits lifelong noninvasive monitoring of cell proliferation of specific cell lineages in live animals. Compared with other short-term strategies that require execution of animals, ProTracer does not require sampling or animal sacrifice for tissue processing. To highlight these features, we used ProTracer to study the proliferation of hepatocytes during liver homeostasis and after tissue injury in mice. We show that the protocol is applicable to study any in vivo cell proliferation, which takes ~9 months to finish from mouse generation to data analysis. This protocol can easily be carried out by researchers skilled in mouse-related experiments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37268780What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.