Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37268772›Full record

ArticleJournal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)2023

A smartphone-based tapping task as a marker of medication response in Parkinson's disease: a proof of concept study.

Sanne Broeder, George Roussos, Joni De Vleeschhauwer, Nicholas D'Cruz, Jean-Jacques Orban de Xivry, Alice Nieuwboer

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sanne BroederKU Leuven, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Neurorehabilitation Research Group (eNRGy), Tervuursevest 101, 3001, Leuven, Belgium. sannebroeder@live.com.ORCID 0000-0002-0891-3264
George RoussosDepartment of Computer Science and Information Systems, Birkbeck College, University of London, Malet Street, London, WC1E 7HX, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7665-7303
Joni De VleeschhauwerKU Leuven, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Neurorehabilitation Research Group (eNRGy), Tervuursevest 101, 3001, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-4497-0944
Nicholas D'CruzKU Leuven, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Neurorehabilitation Research Group (eNRGy), Tervuursevest 101, 3001, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-5306-5903
Jean-Jacques Orban de XivryKU Leuven, Department of Kinesiology, Movement Control and Neuroplasticity Research Group, Tervuursevest 101, 3001, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-4603-7939
Alice NieuwboerKU Leuven, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Neurorehabilitation Research Group (eNRGy), Tervuursevest 101, 3001, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-1193-6229
KU Leuven · BEVIB-KU Leuven Center for Brain & Disease Research · BEBirkbeck, University of London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tapping tasks have the potential to distinguish between ON-OFF fluctuations in Parkinson's disease (PD) possibly aiding assessment of medication status in e-diaries and research. This proof of concept study aims to assess the feasibility and accuracy of a smartphone-based tapping task (developed as part of the cloudUPDRS-project) to discriminate between ON-OFF used in the home setting without supervision. 32 PD patients performed the task before their first medication intake, followed by two test sessions after 1 and 3 h. Testing was repeated for 7 days. Index finger tapping between two targets was performed as fast as possible with each hand. Self-reported ON-OFF status was also indicated. Reminders were sent for testing and medication intake. We studied task compliance, objective performance (frequency and inter-tap distance), classification accuracy and repeatability of tapping. Average compliance was 97.0% (± 3.3%), but 16 patients (50%) needed remote assistance. Self-reported ON-OFF scores and objective tapping were worse pre versus post medication intake (p < 0.0005). Repeated tests showed good to excellent test-retest reliability in ON (0.707 ≤ ICC ≤ 0.975). Although 7 days learning effects were apparent, ON-OFF differences remained. Discriminative accuracy for ON-OFF was particularly good for right-hand tapping (0.72 ≤ AUC ≤ 0.80). Medication dose was associated with ON-OFF tapping changes. Unsupervised tapping tests performed on a smartphone have the potential to classify ON-OFF fluctuations in the home setting, despite some learning and time effects. Replication of these results are needed in a wider sample of patients.

Indexed as

Parkinson DiseaseHandHumansProof of Concept StudyReproducibility of ResultsSmartphoneDopaminergic medicationFeasibilityFinger tappingFluctuationParkinson’s diseaseRepeatabilitySmartphone

Identifiers

PMID37268772
PMCPMC10237522
OpenAlexW4379115016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.